Editing Head

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 88: Line 88:




==Parker's Heraldry==
* Parker's Heraldry - http://karlwilcox.com/parker/
http://karlwilcox.com/parker/ [broken link]
 
'''Head'''
'''Head'''
Head, (fr. tête): as will have been noticed, the heads of beasts, birds, and fishes are very frequently represented by
Head, (fr. tête): as will have been noticed, the heads of beasts, birds, and fishes are very frequently represented by
Line 152: Line 150:
==Definition:==  
==Definition:==  
''(includes defaults, proper tinctures, blazoning)''  
''(includes defaults, proper tinctures, blazoning)''  
===August 2020 - gorgon heads cabossed by default===
Marcus Atilius Pansa. Name and device. Per pale argent and sable, a gorgon's head between in saltire four bulls passant respectant all counterchanged. "We are overturning precedent dating to the December 1984 registration of the badge of Manfred von Halsstern, Argent, a Gorgon's head cabossed sable, langued and orbed, within a pair of bull's horns gules where it was stated, "Cabossed is a perfectly reasonable default for a Gorgon's head ­­ it is the obvious and most recognizable aspect -­ but given the proliferation of ad hoc defaults in SCA heraldry, it is probably better to err on the side of explicitness." We explicitly define cabossed as the default orientation of a gorgon's head, and no longer choose to explicitly blazon it."
https://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2020/08/20-08lar.html#117
===May 2011 - wild man vs greenman===
[a human face crined and bearded of oak leaves] This device is returned because the head is not identifiable. Commenters pointed out, rightly, that the head is not only crined and bearded of leaves, it is entirely composed of leaves. Precedent says:
[returning a charge blazoned as a mans head cabossed crined and bearded of leaves] This is being returned for non-reproducibility. If the submitter had drawn what was blazoned we would consider registering it. However, the blazon does not adequately describe the emblazon. While the head could be described as bearded of leaves, we could come up with no heraldic way to describe the hair - crined of leaves does not describe it. (Shane McNeil de la Forest, Sembember 1996, R-An Tir]
Kingdom noted the following precedent:
Blazoned on the LoI as a wildman's head, a wildman or savage is a period heraldic charge that looks little like the charge submitted here: a wildman's head would be a normal human head, bearded, wearing a wreath of leaves. Some commenters suggested this was a greenman's head. The term greenman was coined in 1939 for a medieval artistic motif. There are period examples online (such as at http://www.chrispye-woodcarving.com/greenman/gm_index.html) that look nothing like this submission -- or each other. Some don't even look like human faces. As there is no fixed form (and therefore no heraldic form) for this motif, a greenman's head is not registerable per se. However, as emblazoned the head can be blazoned as a human face crined and bearded of foliage and we will so register it. [Santiago Carrillo de Guadalupe, March 2006 A-Outlands]
Santiago's head, however, is a face outlined with leaves as if they were the beard and hair, not a complete face entirely constructed of leaves, in the modern "green-man" style, and thus the 2006 registration does not overturn the precedent. Bran's is a face entirely composed of leaves, with eyes, nose, and mouth drawn in. Unless period evidence is produced for such a charge in period heraldry, charges composed of leaves will be considered unblazonable and, therefore, unregisterable.
[https://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/elisabeth/armory2.html?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR1SFsO83ER6DAAMAL6Kyhc0kI30FO4T1Pfi0wiHahpe-8M7dbqH1nEh6OI_aem_ZmFrZWR1bW15MTZieXRlcw#CHARGE_HEADH Bran ap Rees, 05/2011, R-East]


===November 2001 - couped/erased:===  
===November 2001 - couped/erased:===  
Line 200: Line 182:
[http://sca.org/heraldry/loar/2001/11/01-11cl.html 11/2001, CL]
[http://sca.org/heraldry/loar/2001/11/01-11cl.html 11/2001, CL]
[http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/francois/wreath.html#COUPED Couped Precedent]
[http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/francois/wreath.html#COUPED Couped Precedent]


==Registerability:==  
==Registerability:==  
(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)
(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)


===May 2018 CL - On "Ululant"===
===August 2011 - full-body demons no longer registerable:===  
SENA A2B4 defines elements which are a step from period practice under core rules... allows for certain charges and motifs which appear neither in European heraldry nor in the previously mentioned categories. These include elements such as paw prints, compass stars, and birds (other than an eagle) displayed. These are tolerated because they're remarkably popular and function effectively as armorial elements without causing undue confusion. However, inclusion or exclusion of these charges in past rulings was far more subjective, and such elements could cease being registerable if they became problematic.
 
It is with this background in mind that we come to the subject of ululant wolves. First appearing in the May 1982 LoAR, the use of ululant, or howling, wolves (and other canids) is long and broad, with just under 200 existing registrations of the term. The term and practice have no basis in period armory or art, but its use in post-period motifs (notably in the American southwest) has led to its popularity in the SCA.
 
As a head posture on a full or demi-beast, its use is not wholly remarkable. Due to period heralds being largely unconcerned with consistency in head placement and orientation on animate charges, the College of Arms doesn't grant any difference between beasts with heads guardant, regardant, or facing the same direction as the torso. In these instances, use of ululant had no impact on conflict, and was merely a note to artists to place the head in the preferred orientation for the submitter.
 
Heads as stand-alone charges, however, present an altogether different scenario. A head facing dexter gets a DC from either a head affronty or a head contourny, and (because SENA A5G7 grants a DC for orientation) also has difference from a head bendwise or palewise. However, ululant heads blur the distinction between orientations, with the angle of registered examples ranging from midway between fesswise and bendwise to fully palewise. This ambiguity in blazon demonstrates the problem with including this post-period motif in SCA heraldry.
 
Therefore, we will be discontinuing use of the term ululant in SCA armory and removing it from Appendix G. When used with a whole or demi wolf, a raised head will be treated as an unblazoned artistic detail and allowed as long as identifiability of the creature is maintained. Depictions of animal heads as stand-alone charges should have the heads in a clearly recognizable orientation, with the neck either perpendicular to the head (couped, erased) or parallel (couped close).
 
Pending documentation, submissions using ululant heads appearing on external letters after September 30, 2018, will no longer be registered.
 
http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2018/05/18-05cl.html#3
 
===August 2011 - demon heads okay, full-body demons no longer registerable:===  
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';">From Wreath: On Demons</span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';">From Wreath: On Demons</span>
*A submission this month included a demon. We have only registered ''a demon'' nine times, most recently in July 2000. Further research has not shown any instances of a demon as a period heraldic charge. Depictions of demons in period medieval art vary wildly: generally shaggy, but occasionally more dragon-like, feet usually cloven but occasionally clawed like a dragon, sometimes with wings, sometimes without, sometimes with horns, sometimes without, sometimes with a very bestial face, sometimes with a more human face. Demons do not appear to have a standard depiction.
*A submission this month included a demon. We have only registered ''a demon'' nine times, most recently in July 2000. Further research has not shown any instances of a demon as a period heraldic charge. Depictions of demons in period medieval art vary wildly: generally shaggy, but occasionally more dragon-like, feet usually cloven but occasionally clawed like a dragon, sometimes with wings, sometimes without, sometimes with horns, sometimes without, sometimes with a very bestial face, sometimes with a more human face. Demons do not appear to have a standard depiction.
Line 225: Line 193:
*This does not affect the registerability of demon heads, which have a far more standard depiction.</span>
*This does not affect the registerability of demon heads, which have a far more standard depiction.</span>
http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2011/08/11-08cl.html
http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2011/08/11-08cl.html
===May 2011 - wild man vs greenman===
[a human face crined and bearded of oak leaves] This device is returned because the head is not identifiable. Commenters pointed out, rightly, that the head is not only crined and bearded of leaves, it is entirely composed of leaves. Precedent says:
[returning a charge blazoned as a mans head cabossed crined and bearded of leaves] This is being returned for non-reproducibility. If the submitter had drawn what was blazoned we would consider registering it. However, the blazon does not adequately describe the emblazon. While the head could be described as bearded of leaves, we could come up with no heraldic way to describe the hair - crined of leaves does not describe it. (Shane McNeil de la Forest, Sembember 1996, R-An Tir]
Kingdom noted the following precedent:
Blazoned on the LoI as a wildman's head, a wildman or savage is a period heraldic charge that looks little like the charge submitted here: a wildman's head would be a normal human head, bearded, wearing a wreath of leaves. Some commenters suggested this was a greenman's head. The term greenman was coined in 1939 for a medieval artistic motif. There are period examples online (such as at http://www.chrispye-woodcarving.com/greenman/gm_index.html) that look nothing like this submission -- or each other. Some don't even look like human faces. As there is no fixed form (and therefore no heraldic form) for this motif, a greenman's head is not registerable per se. However, as emblazoned the head can be blazoned as a human face crined and bearded of foliage and we will so register it. [Santiago Carrillo de Guadalupe, March 2006 A-Outlands]
Santiago's head, however, is a face outlined with leaves as if they were the beard and hair, not a complete face entirely constructed of leaves, in the modern "green-man" style, and thus the 2006 registration does not overturn the precedent. Bran's is a face entirely composed of leaves, with eyes, nose, and mouth drawn in. Unless period evidence is produced for such a charge in period heraldry, charges composed of leaves will be considered unblazonable and, therefore, unregisterable.
[https://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/elisabeth/armory2.html?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR1SFsO83ER6DAAMAL6Kyhc0kI30FO4T1Pfi0wiHahpe-8M7dbqH1nEh6OI_aem_ZmFrZWR1bW15MTZieXRlcw#CHARGE_HEADH Bran ap Rees, 05/2011, R-East]


==Conflict:==  
==Conflict:==  
Line 255: Line 213:




==Identifiability/Reproducibility:==
==Identifiability:==  


===May 2011 - wild man vs greenman===
[a human face crined and bearded of oak leaves] This device is returned because the head is not identifiable. Commenters pointed out, rightly, that the head is not only crined and bearded of leaves, it is entirely composed of leaves. Precedent says:
[returning a charge blazoned as a mans head cabossed crined and bearded of leaves] This is being returned for non-reproducibility. If the submitter had drawn what was blazoned we would consider registering it. However, the blazon does not adequately describe the emblazon. While the head could be described as bearded of leaves, we could come up with no heraldic way to describe the hair - crined of leaves does not describe it. (Shane McNeil de la Forest, Sembember 1996, R-An Tir]
...


[https://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/elisabeth/armory2.html?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR1SFsO83ER6DAAMAL6Kyhc0kI30FO4T1Pfi0wiHahpe-8M7dbqH1nEh6OI_aem_ZmFrZWR1bW15MTZieXRlcw#CHARGE_HEADH Bran ap Rees, 05/2011, R-East]


==Collected Precedents:==  
==Collected Precedents:==  
Please note that all contributions to SCA Heraldry Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see SCA Heraldry Wiki:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)