Editing Kathleen

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
'''From Pelican: No More SCA-Compatibility'''
On the May 2008 Cover Letter, we ruled:
> Therefore, as of the May 2009 decisions meetings, we declare that no new name elements or name patterns will be ruled SCA-compatible, that all names previously ruled SCA-compatible are no longer SCA-compatible and that in order for them to be registered, documentation meeting the same standards as for non-SCA-compatible names will be required.
This ruling went into effect with this, the May 2009 Pelican meeting.
[[http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2009/05/09-05cl.html]]
'''WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wikispace only to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources to verify the information and use them for your documentation.'''
'''WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wikispace only to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources to verify the information and use them for your documentation.'''


Line 32: Line 38:


==Registerability:==  
==Registerability:==  
===May 2008 Cover Letter'''From Pelican: No More SCA-Compatibility'''===
From the <month> <year> LoAR:
> Therefore, as of the May 2009 decisions meetings, we declare that no new name elements or name patterns will be ruled SCA-compatible, that all names previously ruled SCA-compatible are no longer SCA-compatible and that in order for them to be registered, documentation meeting the same standards as for non-SCA-compatible names will be required.
This ruling went into effect with this, the May 2009 Pelican meeting.
[[http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2009/05/09-05cl.html]]
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="3" |'''Kathleen'''
|-
|François la Flamme
|2002.03
|'''From Pelican: Regarding the Name ''Kathleen'''''Two submissions this month raised discussion regarding whether or not ''Kathleen''is a period name.
''Kathleen'' is an Anglicized Irish form of the Gaelic name ''Caitilín'', which itself derives from the Old French ''Cateline''. Forms of ''Caitilín'' have been found in Gaelic dating to the early 15th C and later. This leaves a limited amount of time for ''Caitilín'' to become firmly established enough to generate the Anglicized form ''Kathleen''. At this time, no documentation has been found that ''Kathleen'' was used in period.
''Kathleen'' has been registered 45 times in the last two decades with at least one registration in every year except two. This demonstrates consistent popularity of the name. Regarding recent popularity of the name, there are two submissions this month that include ''Kathleen'' as a given name. Additionally, it was registered once in 2001, once in 1999, and four times in 1998. Given this level of popularity, it is reasonable to consider ''Kathleen'' SCA compatible. [Cover Letter for the 03/2002 LoAR]
|}
http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/CompiledNamePrecedents/Compatible.html
 
 


==Conflict:==
==Conflict:==
Please note that all contributions to SCA Heraldry Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see SCA Heraldry Wiki:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)