Editing Orientation
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wiki to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources as linked below to verify the information and use them for your documentation.''' | '''WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wiki to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources as linked below to verify the information and use them for your documentation.''' | ||
=Definition:= | =Definition:= | ||
Line 65: | Line 64: | ||
==Definition:== | ==Definition:== | ||
===November 2012 CL - Unified Posture and Orientation, Take 2=== | ===November 2012 CL - Unified Posture and Orientation, Take 2=== | ||
Line 118: | Line 106: | ||
http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2012/11/12-11cl.html | http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2012/11/12-11cl.html | ||
===May 2012 CL - Unified Posture and Arrangement | ===May 2012 CL - Unified Posture and Arrangement== | ||
Section A3D2c of the Standards for Evaluation, Unity of Posture and Orientation, states: | Section A3D2c of the Standards for Evaluation, Unity of Posture and Orientation, states: | ||
> The charges within a charge group should be in either identical postures/orientations or an arrangement that includes posture/orientation (in cross, combatant, or in pall points outward, for example). A charge group in which postures for different charges must be blazoned individually will not be allowed without period examples of that combination of postures. Arrangements of charges which cannot be blazoned will not be allowed. Some standard arrangements for period charge groups are discussed in Appendix K. | > The charges within a charge group should be in either identical postures/orientations or an arrangement that includes posture/orientation (in cross, combatant, or in pall points outward, for example). A charge group in which postures for different charges must be blazoned individually will not be allowed without period examples of that combination of postures. Arrangements of charges which cannot be blazoned will not be allowed. Some standard arrangements for period charge groups are discussed in Appendix K. | ||
Line 125: | Line 113: | ||
For example, ''two lions and an eagle// is in a standard two-and-one arrangement for a group of three charges, and is a mixed-type charge group consisting of quadrupeds and birds. Quadrupeds and birds do not have comparable postures, so this is allowable under A3D2c. For example, //two lions and a bear sejant// is a mixed-type charge group consisting of quadrupeds; as quadrupeds do have comparable postures and the lions and bear are not in identical postures, this is not allowable under A3D2c. For example, //two swords in saltire and a lion'' is a mixed-type charge group consisting of inanimate charges and animate charges, which do not have comparable postures. However, the entire group is not in a single unified arrangement, but instead has the swords and the lion arranged separately. This is not an allowable arrangement under A3D2c, without further documentation of its use in period. | For example, ''two lions and an eagle// is in a standard two-and-one arrangement for a group of three charges, and is a mixed-type charge group consisting of quadrupeds and birds. Quadrupeds and birds do not have comparable postures, so this is allowable under A3D2c. For example, //two lions and a bear sejant// is a mixed-type charge group consisting of quadrupeds; as quadrupeds do have comparable postures and the lions and bear are not in identical postures, this is not allowable under A3D2c. For example, //two swords in saltire and a lion'' is a mixed-type charge group consisting of inanimate charges and animate charges, which do not have comparable postures. However, the entire group is not in a single unified arrangement, but instead has the swords and the lion arranged separately. This is not an allowable arrangement under A3D2c, without further documentation of its use in period. | ||
[[http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2012/05/12-05cl.html]] | [[http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2012/05/12-05cl.html]] | ||
==Registerability:== | ==Registerability:== | ||
Line 148: | Line 137: | ||
==Conflict:== | ==Conflict:== | ||
===July 2003 CL - animate/inanimate generally do not have meaningful posture comparison=== | ===July 2003 CL - animate/inanimate generally do not have meaningful posture comparison=== | ||
"Animate and inanimate objects are not generally considered to have a meaningful posture comparison. When comparing lions with swords, we do not give posture difference between these charges - even when we compare the "sort of fesswise" lion passant to a sword palewise, or the "sort of palewise" lion rampant to a sword fesswise." | "Animate and inanimate objects are not generally considered to have a meaningful posture comparison. When comparing lions with swords, we do not give posture difference between these charges - even when we compare the "sort of fesswise" lion passant to a sword palewise, or the "sort of palewise" lion rampant to a sword fesswise." | ||
[http://www.sca.org/heraldry/loar/2003/07/03-07cl.html July 2003 LoAR Cover Letter] | [http://www.sca.org/heraldry/loar/2003/07/03-07cl.html July 2003 LoAR Cover Letter] | ||
==Identifiability:== | ==Identifiability:== |