Arrangement: Difference between revisions

From SCA Heraldry Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(No difference)

Revision as of 13:35, 23 June 2019

WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wikispace only to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources as linked below to verify the information and use them for your documentation. Revised {$revisiondate}.

Glossary of Terms:

The placement of charges in a group relative to the other charges in the group. For example, the arrangement three roundels two and one// is different than the arrangement //three roundels in fess//. Arrangement is sometimes confused with location, and sometimes with orientation. //See also Location, Orientation. [[1]]

#x--Illustrations:Illustrations:

Period:

Animals inverted:

16th 16th

Un-like animals combatant:

BSB


Three charges with central un-like charge:

Insignia Insignia


In annulo, in cross:

[[File:https:fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/10527288_1561908977419935_8918550191973856619_n.jpg?oh=6b11a4eebf79f6856d9d622ceba30c39&oe=55A92766&gda=1438216543_ffaeb3660e026be90b80974bc1a8fc75|221x319px|BSB277]] Siebmacher,
=A Heraldic Primer:=
Arrangements - [[2]] (defunct)
Arrangement refers to the placement of charges relative to other charges in a single grouping. If you have a group of three charges (billets, say) there are many standard ways in which they can be arranged:
Sable, in fess three billets argent.
File:Http:www.sofyalarus.info/heraldicart/HeraldicPrimer/infess.gif Sable, three billets //in pale argent.
File:Http:www.sofyalarus.info/heraldicart/HeraldicPrimer/inpale.gif Sable, three billets, //two and one, argent.
File:Http://www.sofyalarus.info/heraldicart/HeraldicPrimer/twoandone.gif
Sable, three billets, one and two, argent.
File:Http:www.sofyalarus.info/heraldicart/HeraldicPrimer/oneandtwo.gif Sable, //in bend three billets palewise argent.
File:Http:www.sofyalarus.info/heraldicart/HeraldicPrimer/inbend.gif Sable, three billets palewise //in bend sinister argent.
File:Http://www.sofyalarus.info/heraldicart/HeraldicPrimer/inbendsinister.gif
Note that the arrangement can appear in different positions in the blazon. Sometimes it appears before the number; sometimes it appears after the type. Both positions are legal for phrases that begin with the word "in". Phases consisting of lists of numbers should only appear afterthe type.
Note that it was necessary to specify the orientation of the billets when they were arranged "in bend" and "in bend sinister". This is because:
* charges arranged "in bend" are oriented "bendwise" by default
* charges arranged "in bend sinister" are oriented "bendwise sinister" by default
In many circumstances, there is a default arrangement. For instance, a group of three charges on the field are "two and one" if no other arrangement is specified.
=SENA:=
===Appendix K: Standard Arrangements for Charge Groups of Different Number===
http:heraldry.sca.org/sena.html#AppendixK


This appendix is a tool to determine if two charge groups of different sizes with different arrangements have comparable arrangements. First, identify the number of charges in each group and their arrangement. If the arrangement of either group is not listed below, then they are not in a standard arrangement and no DC can generally be given for arrangement between the two designs. Next, check to see if the arrangement of the first group is also listed for the number of charges in the second group. Also check to see if the arrangement of the second group is also listed for the number of charges in the first group. If the answer is yes for both, then the arrangements are comparable and there is a DC between them for change to arrangement. If the answer is no to either one (or to both), the change to arrangement is forced and there is no DC between them. List of Standard Arrangements by Number of Charges in a Group:

  • For groups with one charge: in chief, in canton, in sinister chief, central, in base
  • For groups with two charges: in pale, in fess (whether respectant, facing the same way, or addorsed), in (fess in) chief, in bend, in bend sinister, crossed in saltire
  • For groups with three charges: two and one, one and two, in pale, in fess, in (fess in) chief, in bend, in bend sinister, in annulo
  • For groups with four or more charges: in cross, in saltire, in pale, in fess, in (fess in) chief, in bend, in bend sinister, semy, in annulo, an orle of charge

Precedents:

Precedents of the SCA College of Arms - [[3]] Morsulus Heralds Website - [[4]] (to search the LoARs and Precedents) Restatement Wiki - [[5]] (restatements of Precedents) Use the above links to be sure any precedents listed below haven't been superseded by newer precedents.

Definition:

June 2013 Cover Letter - Handling Pairs and Sheaves in Arrangements:

Commenters were asked to discuss how best to handle sheaves or pairs of charges combined with other charges in the same charge group. SENA A3D2c requires charges in a group to be in identical postures/orientations or in an arrangement that includes posture/orientation. It also states, "A charge group in which postures for different charges must be blazoned individually will not be allowed without period examples of that combination of postures." Precedent has said, "The charges here do not have comparable postures or orientations, but they also are not in a unified standard arrangement, as the two chisels in saltire must be blazoned separately from the crab in order to adequately describe their positioning. [William the Myllwright, R-Atenveldt, Dec 2012 LoAR]" However, does this precedent follow period practice? Commenters dug through many different armorials across all of Europe to find out. Most cases of pairs of charges have a single pair of identical charges in saltire as the sole primary charge group. There were also examples of multiple pairs of identical charges in the same charge group. More uncommon were examples of non-identical charges in saltire, most typically a key or a sword and another charge, as they tended to be ecclesiastically related. There were no examples found of multiple pairs of non-identical charges in the same charge group. For an example of multiple pairs of charges in the same design, the arms of the Worshipful Company of Fishmongers, granted in 1512, are Azure, three dolphins naiant embowed in pale argent finned toothed and crowned Or between two pairs of stockfish in saltire argent over the mouth of each fish a crown Or, on a chief gules three pairs of keys of St Peter in saltire. Most cases of a sheaf of charges were sheaves of arrows. There were other examples of three identical charges arranged in a sheaf, and a few example of two charges in saltire surmounted by a different charge palewise, again typically ecclesiastical in nature, such as two keys in saltire surmounted by a crozier. Again, the vast majority of examples were of a single sheaf as the sole primary charge group. For an example of multiple sheaves of charges in the same design, the arms of Nicholas Robinson, Bishop of Bangor from 1566-1585, are given by Parker as Azure, a chevron between three sheaves of arrows argent. It is tempting to consider a sheaf of charges as a single charge, but it is not: it has long been considered as heraldic shorthand for two charges in saltire surmounted by a third charge palewise, and the charges that make up the sheaf are counted individually for purposes of differencing by number. Likewise, while it is tempting to consider a pair of charges in saltire as a single charge, it is not; it is clearly two separate charges arranged in saltire. However, SENA A3D2c does not concern counting charges, merely their placement upon the field in a period arrangement. Given the period examples, we are overturning past precedent forbidding the combination of a charge and two other charges in saltire, or other similar combinations. We will henceforth treat a pair of charges in saltire and a sheaf of charges as a single unit only for purposes of arrangement under SENA A3D2c. As always, the entire charge group must be in a blazonable period arrangement, such as two and one, in fess, in cross, etc. [[6]]

November 2012 Cover Letter - Charge Groups Doing the Splits

Now that we've covered the posture/orientation of individual charges in a group, we turn to their placement upon the field. SENA A3D2c only peripherally covers this topic when it references SENA Appendix K, which lists some standard arrangements. However, Appendix K is primarily intended for determining if a DC for change of arrangement exists when comparing two groups from two pieces of armory. It does not list all of the possible standard period arrangements for charges in a single group on the field.

When considering a group of charges split over a divided field or separated by a central ordinary, period armory typically draws and places such charges in whatever way allows them to best fit and take up the most space possible. Examples:

* BSB Cod.icon.291, f. 13r: _Argent, on a bend sable between three wolf's heads gules three birds argent_. The two wolf heads in the upper portion of the field are in fess.

* BSB Cod.icon.291, f. 24r: _Gules, a bend between six cross crosslets fitchy argent_. The three crosses in the upper portion of the field are placed two-and-one, and the three crosses in the lower portion of the field are in bend.

* Beinecke MS 648, f. 38v: _Or, a bend between six martlets gules, a label azure_. The three martlets in the upper portion of the field are placed "in right triangle" to follow the edge of the shield, with one firmly in the corner, one to the left, and one below. The three martlets in the lower portion of the field are in bend.

* The Luttrell Psalter, f. 202v, has an illumination showing six different depictions of the same arms. Sir Geoffrey Luttrell's arms were "Azure, a bend between six martlets argent". His arms are shown on a heater shield, like our device form escutcheon, on his ailettes, a square shape like our badge form, a triangular pennant, his saddle, his horse barding, his crest, his surcoat, and on two dresses. The martlets on either side of the bend are arranged in all combinations of two-and-one, "in right triangle", in bend, in pale, and "in swoop" where the birds are mostly in bend with the centermost moved out of line a bit.

Therefore, charges in a single group split in two by a field division or a central ordinary that are placed to reasonably fill the space available to them and that are similar to period patterns will be considered to be in a default arrangement, and they do not require their exact positioning to be blazoned. This is similar to our policy of allowing and not distinguishing various period-style arrangements of strewn charges, and in general not blazoning period-style artistic variations. Note that this applies only to arrangement, not to posture or orientation. http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2012/11/12-11cl.html

February 2008 Cover Letter - On Sheaves:

A submission this month (Marguerite la fileresse de saie, Artemisia) raised the question whether a sheaf should be considered a single charge or three charges. Recent precedent has been that a sheaf of charges should be considered a single charge. While there may be earlier precedents, the easiest precedent to find is from June 2001: "A sheaf is considered a single charge, therefore there is only a single CD for changing the type of the secondary charges." This was upheld in July 2003 (v. Bjorn Krom Hakenberg, Atenveldt). Consider two hypothetical cases. First, comparing Argent, a fess between two books vert// to //Argent, a fess between two sheaves of arrows vert//. Second, comparing //Argent, a fess between two books vert// to //Argent, a fess between two pairs of arrows in saltire vert. Given the 2001 precedent, the first case would be a conflict with a single CD for changing the type of secondary charges, but the second would be clear with a CD for changing the type and number of secondary charges. This treatment of charges seems inconsistent and nearly impossible to explain to submitters. In June 1990 Laurel ruled: > The usage "a sheaf" for "two [charges] in saltire surmounted by a third palewise" is a space-saving Society convention: it does not necessarily mean that the [charges] must be counted for difference as a single unit any more than a sword and a quill in saltire would be considered a single item. (17 Jun 90, p. 13) This view of a sheaf of charges is more consistent with how we treat other arrangements of charges. The 2001 precedent defining a sheaf of charges as a single charge is hereby overturned: a sheaf of charges shall be considered as three charges in a specific arrangement, not a single charge. [[7]]

September 2003 LoAR - in orle:

In a charge group blazoned as An orle of [charges] in orle//, the charges are arranged //in orle// and the postures of the charges tilt so that they follow each other. Thus, an //orle of fish naiant// would all be in the default naiant (fesswise) posture, but an //orle of fish naiant in orle swim head to tail." [2003 LoAR]

September 2003 LoAR - on a chapé field:

[Argent chapé azure, three goblets two and one gules] It is not clear what the default arrangement for three charges on a chapé field should be. The usual default on a plain field (two and one) doesn't fit well on a chapé field, and thus seems an unlikely default for that field. We have thus blazoned the arrangement explicitly. [Waldemar Stanislaw of White Mountain, 09/2003, A-Trimaris] http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/francois/wreath.html#DEFAULT

August 1993 LoAR - in annulo:

"the in annulo// placement visually dominates, and thus subsumes, any specification of direction. //Widdershins// vs. //deasil// is simply an artistic nuance of //in annulo,// and need not be blazoned." [Clarification note: Thus there is no difference between "three X in annulo" and "three X contourny in annulo".] August 1993 LoAR

February 1985 LoAR - six charges:

"The default arrangement for six charges is three, two and one. [BoE, 3 Feb 85, p.8]" - http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/baldwin.html


#x--Precedents:-Registerability:Registerability:

(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)

January 2014 Cover Letter - Phases of the Moon:

The "phases of the moon" motif of a roundel between an increscent and a decrescent has long been considered a step from period practice. As early as August 1989 it was declared "not really period style," but did not seem to be considered a step from period practice until September 1998. We know that the motif of an X between two Ys is a fairly common one in later period English armory. Non Scripta found evidence of a rose between two lions combattant and a mullet between two lions combattant, and Elmet added a fleur-de-lys between two rabbits passant respectant, all in English armory. Orle actually found a roundel between a decrescent and an increscent in Italian armory. We have never considered an X between two Ys respectant to be considered a step from period practice with any other combination of charges, only with a roundel and crescents, which is not consistent. Therefore, we are overturning past precedent. This motif is no longer considered a step from period practice. http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2014/01/14-01cl.html

December 2012 Cover Letter - In Annulo and You

A submission this month raised the issue of whether or not multiple charges _in annulo_, where the charges are arranged and turned in a circle so that each charge has a different orientation, is found in period armory. Evidence provided suggests that in fact it is not a period motif at all. Multiple charges arranged _in annulo_ or _in orle_ are typically only found _palewise_ in period armory.

However, that design motif has a long history in Society heraldry, and so we are not inclined to banish it at this time. Therefore, the motif of multiple' charges _in annulo_ or _in orle_, where the charges are not in their default 'orientation is henceforth considered a step from period practice. http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2012/12/12-12cl.html

#x--Precedents:-Conflict:Conflict:

August 1993 LoAR - in annulo:

"the in annulo// placement visually dominates, and thus subsumes, any specification of direction. //Widdershins// vs. //deasil// is simply an artistic nuance of //in annulo,// and need not be blazoned." [Clarification note: Thus there is no difference between "three X in annulo" and "three X contourny in annulo".] August 1993 LoAR


#x--Precedents:-Identifiability:Identifiability:

#x--Precedents:-Collected Precedents:Collected Precedents:

2nd Tenure of Elisabeth de Rossignol (April 2011 - 2011) - [[8]] 1st Tenure of Elisabeth de Rossignol (May 2005 - July 2008) - ARRANGEMENT, [- Conjoined], ARRANGEMENT - Forced Move

The 2nd Tenure of François la Flamme (October 2004 - May 2005) - [[9]] The Tenure of Shauna of Carrick Point (May 2004 - August 2004) - Arrangement, [Conjoined], [Forced Move], -- Three Charges The Tenure of François la Flamme (August 2001 - April 2004) - ARRANGEMENT, [-- Conjoined], ARRANGEMENT -- Forced Move The Tenure of Elsbeth Anne Roth (June 1999 - July 2001) - [[10]] The Tenure of Jaelle of Armida (June 1996 - June 1999) - na The 2nd Tenure of Da'ud ibn Auda (November 1993 - June 1996) - [[11]] The Tenure of Bruce Draconarius of Mistholme (June 1992 - October 1993) - [[12]] The 1st Tenure of Da'ud ibn Auda (June 1990 - June 1992) - ARRANGEMENT (first part), ARRANGEMENT (second part) The Tenure of Alisoun MacCoul of Elphane (September 1986 - June 1990) - na The Tenure of Baldwin of Erebor (August 1984 - August 1986) - [HTML Document] The Tenure of Wilhelm von Schlüssel (August 1979 - August 1984) - [[13]] The Tenure of Karina of the Far West (December 1975 - June 1979) - na The Early Days (June 1971 - June 1975) - [[14]]

In the Ordinary:

Retrieved from "http://scaheraldry.info/index.php?title=Arrangement&oldid=5233"