Label

From SCA Heraldry Wiki
Revision as of 14:51, 8 January 2020 by Sofya (talk | contribs) (→‎Precedents:)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wikispace only to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources as linked below to verify the information and use the original sources for your documentation. Revised {$revisiondate}.


Illustrations:

Period source/s:


An Ordinary of Siebmacher's Wappenbuch - http://www.ellipsis.cx/~liana/heraldry/siebmacher/f-siebmacher.html

Data Analysis of Emblazons Containing Labels by Gunnvǫr silfrahárr - http://www.vikinganswerlady.com/Stars/Labels.htm]

Modern:

Pictorial Dictionary of SCA Heraldry (3rd edition):

Illustration/s from Brickbat's Armorial Stash - [[2]]:

Pennsic Traceable Art Project:


Precedents:

From Wreath: Labels

A submission this month caused us to reconsider how we blazon labels in SCA armory. Past precedent says: > [a label dovetailed throughout] A peculiarity of SCA blazon is that the standard label is throughout by default, but the dovetailed label is couped by default. The blazon in this submission label is both dovetailed and throughout, and both these details must be blazoned. [Kharra Unegen, 07/2002, A-Atenveldt] After some research, much provided by Gunnvor silfraharr, we see no reason why the specific details of a label need to be blazoned, as the depictions vary only slightly over different times and cultures. There has never been difference granted between labels throughout or not, or dovetailed or not, and we see no need to change that. Therefore, we will cease blazoning the exact style of label, and leave the specific stylings up to artistic preference. [[3]]


The Ordinary: