Enflamed
WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wikispace only to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources as linked below to verify the information and use them for your documentation.
The preferred, period form of "flaming" per 1993 precedent. See below.
Definition:
Glossary of Terms - A charge which has small gouts of flame issuing from it. See also On a flame. [[1]]
Illustrations:
Illustration from period source:
| Siebmacher | Siebmacher |
Pictorial Dictionary of SCA Heraldry (3rd edition):
- [[2]]
Illustration/s from Brickbat's Armorial Stash - [[3]]: Brickbats
Pennsic Traceable Art Project:
Sources:
Academy of St. Gabriel "Medieval Heraldry Archive" - [[4]] Archive of St. Gabriel reports - [[5]]
Laurel Armory Articles - [[6]]
Precedents:
Precedents of the SCA College of Arms - [[7]] Morsulus Heralds Website - [[8]] (to search the LoARs and Precedents) Restatement Wiki - [[9]] (restatements of Precedents) Use the above links to be sure any precedents listed below haven't been superseded by newer precedents.
#x--Precedents:-Definition/Defining Instance:Definition/Defining Instance:
From the June 1993 Cover Letter:
For some time now, we've been instituting a change (actually dating from Master Da'ud's tenure as Laurel) on enflamed charges: how they're considered, and how they're blazoned. In the early days of the Society, a [charge] enflamed// was depicted as a //[charge]//completely enveloped by flame --- essentially a full flame, with the [charge] entirely on the flame. In those cases, the [charge] was considered the primary charge, with the flames either an artistic detail or a complex sort of fimbriation. More recently, such designs have been blazoned //On a flame a [charge], making the flame the primary and the [charge] a tertiary. This has two effects: it brings our heraldic practice closer to that of period, and it alters the way difference is counted against such designs.
On the first point, enflamed charges weren't normally depicted in period armory as enveloped of flames. Discounting the fiery charges whose flames have a defined placement (e.g., the beacon//), a period enflamed charge would be drawn with tiny spurts of flame issuant from several points. //Mounts enflamed// were not uncommon: in addition to the examples of MacKenzie armory cited by Lady Black Stag (in her commentary on Michael McKenzie, on this LoAR), there's the //mountain couped azure enflamed proper//in the arms of MacLeod (Guillim, 1632, p.127) and the //trimount couped vert enflamed gules// in the arms of Lerchenfeld (Siebmacher, 1605, plate 95) and Nouwer (Armorial de Gelres, c.1370, fo.40). There's also the arms of Brandt (//Argent, a ragged staff bendwise sable enflamed gules//), where the enflaming is depicted in various sources (Siebmacher , Gelres, the European Armoria) as on the top end of the staff, issuant from each "ragged" portion, or issuant to chief --- but never as //On a flame gules a ragged staff sable//. The salamander is usually shown with spurts of flame, but occasionally as lying on a bed of flame (Dennys' Heraldic Imagination, p.193); but I could find no period emblazon showing the salamander as a tertiary on a flame. The enflamed towers of the arms of Dublin are drawn with spurts of fire from the battlements and windows, not as flames with tertiary towers. I could go on, but I think the point is made: in period, the normal depiction of a //[charge] enflamed showed the charge on the field, with tiny spurts of flame issuant (and also on the field).
Two consequences follow from this depiction. First, the [charge]// and the flames must both have good contrast with the field. Enflaming isn't a way to get around the Rule of Tincture; we don't permit flaming fimbriation in Society armory. Second, by the period definition of //enflaming// an enflamed //[charge]// is definitely the main charge; but by the old SCA definition, an enflamed //[charge]//is now considered a tertiary charge. We'd count Sufficient Difference, per X.2, between //a lion Or enflamed gules// and //a tower Or enflamed gules//, but no difference at all, per X.4.j.ii, between on //a flame gules a lion Or// and //on a flame gules a tower Or.
In all ways, then, it's in the submitter's best interest to render an enflamed charge in the period style, rather than as a tertiary on a flame. It's more authentic, and it reduces the chance of conflict. (24 July, 1993 Cover Letter (June, 1993 LoAR), pp. 5-6) [[10]]
#x--Precedents:-Registerability:Registerability:
(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)
#x--Precedents:-Conflict:Conflict:
#x--Precedents:-Identifiability:Identifiability:
Collected Precedents:
Tenure of Elisabeth de Rossignol (May 2005 - July 2008) - [and FIRE] The 2nd Tenure of François la Flamme (October 2004 - May 2005) - [and FIRE] The Tenure of Shauna of Carrick Point (May 2004 - August 2004) - The Tenure of François la Flamme (August 2001 - April 2004) - The Tenure of Elsbeth Anne Roth (June 1999 - July 2001) - The Tenure of Jaelle of Armida (June 1996 - June 1999) - The 2nd Tenure of Da'ud ibn Auda (November 1993 - June 1996) - The Tenure of Bruce Draconarius of Mistholme (June 1992 - October 1993) - The 1st Tenure of Da'ud ibn Auda (June 1990 - June 1992) - The Tenure of Alisoun MacCoul of Elphane (September 1986 - June 1990) - The Tenure of Baldwin of Erebor (August 1984 - August 1986) - The Tenure of Wilhelm von Schlüssel (August 1979 - August 1984) - The Tenure of Karina of the Far West (December 1975 - June 1979) - The Early Days (June 1971 - June 1975) -
The [[11]]: