Laurel (name)

From SCA Heraldry Wiki
Revision as of 19:08, 3 April 2019 by Sofya (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wikispace only to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources to verify the information and use them for your documentation.


Period Forms:[edit | edit source]

  • Name - type of name (eg. English feminine give name), date, source.


Other Potential Sources:[edit | edit source]




Precedents:[edit | edit source]

  • Precedents of the SCA College of Arms - [[1]]
  • Morsulus Heralds Website - [[2]] (to search the LoARs and Precedents)
  • Use the above links to be sure any precedents listed below haven't been superseded by newer precedents.

Registerability:[edit | edit source]

From Pelican: No More SCA-Compatibility[edit | edit source]

On the May 2008 Cover Letter, we ruled: > Therefore, as of the May 2009 decisions meetings, we declare that no new name elements or name patterns will be ruled SCA-compatible, that all names previously ruled SCA-compatible are no longer SCA-compatible and that in order for them to be registered, documentation meeting the same standards as for non-SCA-compatible names will be required. This ruling went into effect with this, the May 2009 Pelican meeting. [[3]]

Laurel
Da'ud ibn Auda (2nd tenure, 2nd year) 1995.11 Laurel has not been shown to be period, but it is her modern given name. As a given name it is no more presumptuous than Rose, which we have registered many times (and as recently as 6/95): the names of Society orders are neither titles nor styles of address. (Talan Gwynek, LoAR November 1995, p. 10)

http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/CompiledNamePrecedents/Compatible.html


Conflict:[edit | edit source]

From the <month> <year> LoAR:

Collected Precedents:[edit | edit source]