Mon

From SCA Heraldry Wiki
Revision as of 11:37, 9 March 2024 by Sofya (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Logocaption.jpg
WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wiki to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources (generally linked) to verify the information and use them for your documentation. Contact the editor-in-chief, Sofya la Rus, if there are copyright concerns or other issues.  sofya at calontiri dot info 

Glossary of Terms:[edit | edit source]

Japanese armorial insignia. The SCA allows mon-like designs only if they can be blazoned in European heraldic terms. http://heraldry.sca.org/coagloss.html


Sources:[edit | edit source]

An Essay on Mons - http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/mons/ (defunct link, Internet Archive Wayback Machine version missing illustrations - http://web.archive.org/web/20120122080131/http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/mons/ )

Pictorial Dictionary - Tomoe

A Roll of Japanese Armory - http://s-gabriel.org/heraldry/solveig/kamon/

O-umajirushi: 17th Century Samurai Heraldry

Kihō's Japanese Heraldry Database A compendium of mon (crests) and other forms of Japanese heraldry, focusing on early Edo and pre-Edo Japan.

SENA A2.B.4.a - non-European armorial elements[edit | edit source]

a. Non-European Armorial Elements: Elements found only in non-European armorial traditions (e.g., Islamic and Japanese heraldry) are registerable but a step from period practice. The use of two such elements requires the use of the Individually Attested Pattern rules, discussed in [[1]]. These elements must still be describable in standard SCA heraldic terms. The use of elements found in period European armory is not a step from period practice, even if they were also used in non-European contexts.

http://heraldry.sca.org/sena.html#A2


Precedents:[edit | edit source]

Precedents of the SCA College of Arms - http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents.html
Morsulus Heralds Website - http://www.morsulus.org/ (to search the LoARs and Precedents)

Use the above links to be sure any precedents listed below haven't been superseded by newer precedents.

Definition:[edit | edit source]

August 1999 - mon same as devices[edit | edit source]

"This was submitted on a badge form as mon. We no longer distinguish mon from devices and generally require that they also be submitted on device forms." August 1999 LoAR


Registerability:[edit | edit source]

(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)

March 2015 - tomoe[edit | edit source]

[#57] Miura no Matatarou Koreyoshi. Badge. Argent, five tomoe in annulo each charged with a plate, all within an annulet sable. This device is returned for running afoul of SENA A that states "The armorial elements, charge groups, and overall design must be demonstrated to be compatible with period style." In an attempt as Individually Attested Pattern, this submission documented uncharged tomoe in annulo in groups of three. However, it did not document tomoe in groups of five or charged tomoe. Tomoe in groups of three may be registerable with a step from period practice. However, pending documentation, the arrangement submitted here is not. On redesign, please advise the submitter to draw the annulet larger so that it is clearly visible.

July 2014 - imperial chyrsanthemum restricted:[edit | edit source]

From Wreath: Adding the Japan Emperor mon to the list of restricted charges

A submission considered this month was using a charge of a sixteen-petalled lotus affronty which led to discussion about the mon of the emperor of Japan. Discussion brought to light the fact that the current protected form of the mon is not accurately reflecting actual usage. At this point, we are reblazoning it and adding it to the list of restricted charges as a sixteen-petalled chrysanthemum. http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2014/07/14-07cl.html

February 2003 - Japanese stream:[edit | edit source]

"Previous precedents have indicated that design elements which are only found in Japanese mon may only be registered if they can be blazoned in European heraldic terms. Previous precedent has also held that a Japanese stream cannot be blazoned in European heraldic terms. No evidence has been presented which either overturns the philosophical basis of the previous precedents, or which presents an acceptable European blazon for the Japanese stream. Thus, the Japanese stream design element continues to be unregisterable." February 2003 LoAR


September 1995 - Japanese stream:[edit | edit source]

[returning a Japanese stream] "The primary charge is not blazonable in standard heraldic terminology, as required by RfS VII.7.b."September 1995 LoAR

November 1992 - tomoe:[edit | edit source]

"In general, Mon-like designs are acceptable in Society armory only if they can be blazoned in European heraldic terms - as though a period Japanese, visiting Europe, were attempting to register his Mon with one of the kings of arms. Tomoe cannot be blazoned in European terms, and so cannot be considered compatible with European heraldry. This submission, though a splendid Japanese design, may not be registered in the Society." [but see March 2015 and SENA A2.B.4.a. above] November 1992 LoAR

Conflict:[edit | edit source]

Identifiability:[edit | edit source]

Collected Precedents:[edit | edit source]


Logocaption.jpg
WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wiki to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources (generally linked) to verify the information and use them for your documentation. Contact the editor-in-chief, Sofya la Rus, if there are copyright concerns or other issues.  sofya at calontiri dot info