Crown: Difference between revisions

From SCA Heraldry Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 47: Line 47:
"We wish to remind the College of Arms that being a territorial baroness alone does '''not''' allow one to register armory with a coronet." [http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2006/04/06-04lar.html April 2006 LoAR]
"We wish to remind the College of Arms that being a territorial baroness alone does '''not''' allow one to register armory with a coronet." [http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2006/04/06-04lar.html April 2006 LoAR]


===May 2005 - default coronet, some others allowed===:
===May 2005 - default coronet, some others allowed===
Precedent says, "While it has been true that the default coronet is a simple coronet of three points, we have for a while now been allowing the blazon coronet to be used with any period depiction of a coronet that is not otherwise reserved". No documentation was provided showing that a coronet with single central point at the front is a period depiction of a coronet.[http://www.sca.org/heraldry/loar/2005/05/05-05lar.html May 2005 LoAR]
Precedent says, "While it has been true that the default coronet is a simple coronet of three points, we have for a while now been allowing the blazon coronet to be used with any period depiction of a coronet that is not otherwise reserved". No documentation was provided showing that a coronet with single central point at the front is a period depiction of a coronet.[http://www.sca.org/heraldry/loar/2005/05/05-05lar.html May 2005 LoAR]


Line 62: Line 62:
===November 1984 LoAR - crowns not for baronies===
===November 1984 LoAR - crowns not for baronies===
"Baronies are '''not''' permitted to have crowns in their arms (they are not considered sovereign), so it would be inappropriate for a territorial baron to do so." [http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/1984/11/cvr.html November 1984 LoAR Cover Letter]
"Baronies are '''not''' permitted to have crowns in their arms (they are not considered sovereign), so it would be inappropriate for a territorial baron to do so." [http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/1984/11/cvr.html November 1984 LoAR Cover Letter]


==Conflict:==
==Conflict:==

Revision as of 11:07, 6 March 2021

WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wiki only to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources as linked below to verify the information and use them for your documentation.

Examples:

Period sources:

File:Siebmacher plate067 monkcrown.jpg
Siebmacher 1605, plate 67, crown and monk

Modern:

Pictorial Dictionary of SCA Heraldry (3rd edition):

Annotated Pennsic Traceable Art Project


Sources:

Academy of St. Gabriel "Medieval Heraldry Archive" - http://www.s-gabriel.org/heraldry/
Archive of St. Gabriel reports - http://www.panix.com/~gabriel/public-bin/archive.cgi
Laurel Armory Articles - http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/armory_articles.html
Period Armorials


Precedents:

Precedents of the SCA College of Arms - http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents.html
Morsulus Heralds Website - http://www.morsulus.org/ (to search the LoARs and Precedents)
Use the above links to be sure any precedents listed below haven't been superseded by newer precedents.


Definition:

===May 2005 - default coronet, some others allowed===: Precedent says, "While it has been true that the default coronet is a simple coronet of three points, we have for a while now been allowing the blazon coronet to be used with any period depiction of a coronet that is not otherwise reserved". No documentation was provided showing that a coronet with single central point at the front is a period depiction of a coronet.May 2005 LoAR

April 2000 - pearled coronets period

"Clarion has given evidence that pearled coronets existed in 16th century Scotland, although they were not associated with barons. Therefore we are allowing the use of pearled coronets; however, if the type of coronet is blazoned at all, it will be blazoned as pearled not baronial." April 2000 LoAR

November 1991 LoAR - no standard viscomital coronet

There is no 'standard' viscomital coronet, either as a physical entity or an heraldic convention.' Viscounts and Viscountesses may use the default heraldic coronet (a crown indented of three points) if they so choose." November 1991 LoAR

Registerability (Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP):

April 2006 - no coronet for territorial baron/ess

"We wish to remind the College of Arms that being a territorial baroness alone does not allow one to register armory with a coronet." April 2006 LoAR

May 2005 - default coronet, some others allowed

Precedent says, "While it has been true that the default coronet is a simple coronet of three points, we have for a while now been allowing the blazon coronet to be used with any period depiction of a coronet that is not otherwise reserved". No documentation was provided showing that a coronet with single central point at the front is a period depiction of a coronet.May 2005 LoAR

October 2001 - court baron can have coronet

"He is also a court baron and thus entitled to bear a coronet." October 2001 LoAR

April 2000 - pearled coronets period

"Clarion has given evidence that pearled coronets existed in 16th century Scotland, although they were not associated with barons. Therefore we are allowing the use of pearled coronets; however, if the type of coronet is blazoned at all, it will be blazoned as pearled not baronial." April 2000 LoAR

May 1999 - coronets okay for court baron/ess

"This hereby overturns the ban on people of baronial rank using coronets in their arms. Henceforth, in addition to royal peers, court barons/esses may use coronets in their arms. Note: this does not include territorial barons/esses, since that is not a permanent rank. Just as a sitting king/queen/prince/princess cannot put a coronet on their arms until after they have attained the rank of count/ess or viscount/ess, since, while it is rare, there have been cases of royalty who have not completed their reign, neither can a territorial baron/ess, unless they are already a court baron/ess, use a coronet, since they have not attained a permanent baronial rank." May 1999 LoAR


November 1984 LoAR - crowns not for baronies

"Baronies are not permitted to have crowns in their arms (they are not considered sovereign), so it would be inappropriate for a territorial baron to do so." November 1984 LoAR Cover Letter

Conflict:

December 2002 - no difference for adding a crown to a head

"Without period evidence to the contrary, and because of the contrast problems inherent in the design of a crown on an animal's head, it does not seem appropriate to give difference for adding a crown to a charge consisting only of an animal's head."December 2002 LoAR Cover Letter

Identifiability:

April 2002 - gorged of a coronet like tertiary charge

"A beast's head gorged of a coronet or collar is treated by the SCA as having a tertiary charge." "A tertiary charge needs to have good contrast with the underlying charge." April 2002 LoAR


Collected Precedents:


In the Ordinary

(includes chess king, circlet, comital coronet, coronet, ducal coronet, hat)