Enflamed: Difference between revisions

From SCA Heraldry Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
----
----
The preferred, period form of "flaming" per 1993 precedent. See below.
The preferred, period form of "flaming" per 1993 precedent. See below.
See also [[Fire]]
----
----
===<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Definition:</span>===  
=Definition:=  
Glossary of Terms - A charge which has small gouts of flame issuing from it. ''See also'' [[scaheraldry/On a flame|On a flame]].
Glossary of Terms - A charge which has small gouts of flame issuing from it. ''See also'' [[Fire]].
[[http://heraldry.sca.org/coagloss.html]]
http://heraldry.sca.org/coagloss.html


----
 
===<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Illustrations:</span>===  
=Examples:=  
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Illustration from period source:</span>
==Period source:==
{|
{|
| [[File:Siebmacher_plate095_enflamedmount.jpg|Siebmacher]] || [[File:Siebmacher_plate041_enflamedstaff.jpg|Siebmacher]] ||   
| [[File:Siebmacher_plate095_enflamedmount.jpg|Siebmacher]] || [[File:Siebmacher_plate041_enflamedstaff.jpg|Siebmacher]] ||   
|}
|}


===An Ordinary of Siebmacher's ''Wappenbuch''===
* http://www.ellipsis.cx/~liana/heraldry/siebmacher/siebmacherordinary.html
==Modern==
===Pictorial Dictionary of SCA Heraldry (3rd edition):===
<span style="display: block; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
* [http://mistholme.com/dictionary/flame/ Flame]


Per Mistholme, may use PicDic art for submission purposes without prior permission.


'''Pictorial Dictionary of SCA Heraldry (3rd edition):'''
===Vector Graphics:===
* [[Book of Traceable Heraldic Art]] - http://heraldicart.org/


<span style="display: block; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
===Annotated [[Pennsic Traceable Art Project]]===
* <span style="font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">''<span style="background-color: #edf6fe; color: #333333; font-family: Verdana,sans-serif; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="color: #123b66; font-family: inherit; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">[[http://mistholme.com/dictionary/flame/|Flame]]</span></span>''</span>
 
</span>
 
=Sources:=
Academy of St. Gabriel "Medieval Heraldry Archive" - http://www.s-gabriel.org/heraldry/ <br>
Archive of St. Gabriel reports - http://www.panix.com/~gabriel/public-bin/archive.cgi <br>


Laurel Armory Articles - http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/armory_articles.html


[[Period Armorials]]


<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Illustration/s from Brickbat's Armorial Stash - [[http://atensubmissions.nexiliscom.com/HeraldicArtBits.shtml]]:</span>
[[File:salamander|Brickbats]]


<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Pennsic Traceable Art Project:</span>
=Precedents:=
Precedents of the SCA College of Arms - [[http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents.html <br>
Morsulus Heralds Website - http://www.morsulus.org/ (to search the LoARs and Precedents)


----
'' '''Use the above links to be sure any precedents listed below haven't been superseded by newer precedents.''' ''
===<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Sources:</span>===
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Academy of St. Gabriel "Medieval Heraldry Archive" - [[http://www.s-gabriel.org/heraldry/]]</span>
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Archive of St. Gabriel reports - [[http://www.panix.com/~gabriel/public-bin/archive.cgi]]</span>


<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Laurel Armory Articles - [[http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/armory_articles.html]]</span>
==Definition/Defining Instance:==
===November 2020 CL - On Flames
This month, Iago Coquille takes us on an excursion through the depictions of flames in period heraldry. His article is currently available at the Laurel website at https://heraldry.sca.org/armory/flames/, and discusses:
* Flame shape
* Disconnected flames
* Tinctures, including proper
* Depiction of strewn flames


<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[[scaheraldry/Period Armorials|Period Armorials]]</span>
Iago's research affects two items this month. Specifically, we are now overturning precedent: the so-called "crab-claw" depiction, previously viewed as modern as declared on the September 2019 Cover Letter, is now shown to be period and, therefore, usable in Society armory. It is worth noting that not all the sources are Italian -- English, French, and German sources are also represented among others.


----
Additionally, the ways in which multi-color flames have been depicted in period are much more varied than is typical of our practice. In particular, we now have sufficient evidence to support a variety of ways in which flames may incorporate both red and yellow and still be considered proper, extending beyond our long-held standard of alternating tongues of Or and gules, and future submissions will benefit from this evidence.
===<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Precedents:</span>===
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Precedents of the SCA College of Arms - [[http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents.html]]</span>
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Morsulus Heralds Website - [[http://www.morsulus.org/]] (to search the LoARs and Precedents)</span>
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Restatement Wiki - [[http://yehudaheraldry.com/restatement/index.php?title=Main_Page]] (restatements of Precedents)</span>
''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">'''Use the above links to be sure any precedents listed below haven't been superseded by newer precedents.'''</span>''


====<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[[#x--Precedents:-Definition/Defining Instance:]]<u>'''Definition/Defining Instance:'''</u></span>====
https://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2020/11/20-11cl.html
===<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">'''<span style="font-size: 13px;">From the June 1993 Cover Letter:</span>'''</span>===
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">For some time now, we've been instituting a change (actually dating from Master Da'ud's tenure as Laurel) on enflamed charges: how they're considered, and how they're blazoned. In the early days of the Society, a </span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[charge] enflamed</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> was depicted as a </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[charge]</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">completely enveloped by flame --- essentially a full flame, with the [charge] entirely on the flame. In those cases, the [charge] was considered the primary charge, with the flames either an artistic detail or a complex sort of fimbriation. More recently, such designs have been blazoned </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">On a flame a [charge]</span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">, making the flame the primary and the [charge] a tertiary. This has two effects: it brings our heraldic practice closer to that of period, and it alters the way difference is counted against such designs.</span>


<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">On the first point, enflamed charges weren't normally depicted in period armory as enveloped of flames. Discounting the fiery charges whose flames have a defined placement (e.g., the </span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">beacon</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">), a period enflamed charge would be drawn with tiny spurts of flame issuant from several points. </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Mounts enflamed</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> were not uncommon: in addition to the examples of MacKenzie armory cited by Lady Black Stag (in her commentary on Michael McKenzie, on this LoAR), there's the </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">mountain couped azure enflamed proper</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">in the arms of MacLeod ([[scaheraldry/references.html#43|Guillim]], 1632, p.127) and the </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">trimount couped vert enflamed gules</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> in the arms of Lerchenfeld ([[scaheraldry/references.html#86|Siebmacher]], 1605, plate 95) and Nouwer ([[scaheraldry/references.html#48|Armorial de Gelres]], c.1370, fo.40). There's also the arms of Brandt (</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Argent, a ragged staff bendwise sable enflamed gules</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">), where the enflaming is depicted in various sources ([[scaheraldry/references.html#86|Siebmacher ]], Gelres, the [[scaheraldry/references.html#63|European Armoria]]) as on the top end of the staff, issuant from each "ragged" portion, or issuant to chief --- but never as </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">On a flame gules a ragged staff sable</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">. The salamander is usually shown with spurts of flame, but occasionally as lying on a bed of flame (Dennys' [[scaheraldry/references.html#26|Heraldic Imagination]], p.193); but I could find no period emblazon showing the salamander as a tertiary on a flame. The enflamed towers of the arms of Dublin are drawn with spurts of fire from the battlements and windows, not as flames with tertiary towers. I could go on, but I think the point is made: in period, the normal depiction of a </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[charge] enflamed</span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> showed the charge on the field, with tiny spurts of flame issuant (and also on the field).</span>
===June 1993 Cover Letter: period enflaming===
For some time now, we've been instituting a change (actually dating from Master Da'ud's tenure as Laurel) on enflamed charges: how they're considered, and how they're blazoned. In the early days of the Society, a ''[charge] enflamed'' was depicted as a ''[charge]'' completely enveloped by flame --- essentially a full flame, with the [charge] entirely on the flame. In those cases, the [charge] was considered the primary charge, with the flames either an artistic detail or a complex sort of fimbriation. More recently, such designs have been blazoned ''On a flame a [charge]'', making the flame the primary and the [charge] a tertiary. This has two effects: it brings our heraldic practice closer to that of period, and it alters the way difference is counted against such designs.


<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Two consequences follow from this depiction. First, the </span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[charge]</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> and the flames must both have good contrast with the field. Enflaming isn't a way to get around the Rule of Tincture; we don't permit flaming fimbriation in Society armory. Second, by the period definition of </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">enflaming</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> an enflamed </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[charge]</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> is definitely the main charge; but by the old SCA definition, an enflamed </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[charge]</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">is now considered a tertiary charge. We'd count Sufficient Difference, per X.2, between </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">a lion Or enflamed gules</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> and </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">a tower Or enflamed gules</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">, but no difference at all, per X.4.j.ii, between on </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">a flame gules a lion Or</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> and </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">on a flame gules a tower Or</span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">.</span>
On the first point, enflamed charges weren't normally depicted in period armory as enveloped of flames. Discounting the fiery charges whose flames have a defined placement (e.g., the ''beacon''), a period enflamed charge would be drawn with tiny spurts of flame issuant from several points. ''Mounts enflamed'' were not uncommon: in addition to the examples of MacKenzie armory cited by Lady Black Stag (in her commentary on Michael McKenzie, on this LoAR), there's the ''mountain couped azure enflamed proper'' in the arms of MacLeod (Guillim, 1632, p.127) and the ''trimount couped vert enflamed gules'' in the arms of Lerchenfeld (Siebmacher, 1605, plate 95) and Nouwer (Armorial de Gelres, c.1370, fo.40). There's also the arms of Brandt (''Argent, a ragged staff bendwise sable enflamed gules''), where the enflaming is depicted in various sources (Siebmacher, Gelres, the European Armorial) as on the top end of the staff, issuant from each "ragged" portion, or issuant to chief --- but never as ''On a flame gules a ragged staff sable''. The salamander is usually shown with spurts of flame, but occasionally as lying on a bed of flame (Dennys' Heraldic Imagination, p.193); but I could find no period emblazon showing the salamander as a tertiary on a flame. The enflamed towers of the arms of Dublin are drawn with spurts of fire from the battlements and windows, not as flames with tertiary towers. I could go on, but I think the point is made: in period, the normal depiction of a ''[charge] enflamed'' showed the charge on the field, with tiny spurts of flame issuant (and also on the field).


<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">In all ways, then, it's in the submitter's best interest to render an enflamed charge in the period style, rather than as a tertiary on a flame. It's more authentic, </span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">'''and'''</span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> it reduces the chance of conflict. (24 July, 1993 Cover Letter (June, 1993 LoAR), pp. 5-6)</span>
Two consequences follow from this depiction. First, the ''[charge]'' and the flames must both have good contrast with the field. Enflaming isn't a way to get around the Rule of Tincture; we don't permit flaming fimbriation in Society armory. Second, by the period definition of ''enflaming'' an enflamed [charge] is definitely the main charge; but by the old SCA definition, an enflamed [charge] is now considered a tertiary charge. We'd count Sufficient Difference, per X.2, between ''a lion Or enflamed gules'' and ''a tower Or enflamed gules'', but no difference at all, per X.4.j.ii, between on ''a flame gules a lion Or'' and ''on a flame gules a tower Or''.
[[http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/1993/06/cvr.html]]


In all ways, then, it's in the submitter's best interest to render an enflamed charge in the period style, rather than as a tertiary on a flame. It's more authentic, '''and''' it reduces the chance of conflict. (24 July, 1993 Cover Letter (June, 1993 LoAR), pp. 5-6)
http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/1993/06/cvr.html


====<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[[#x--Precedents:-Registerability:]]<u>'''Registerability:'''</u></span>====  
==Registerability:==  
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)</span>
''(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)''


====<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[[#x--Precedents:-Conflict:]]<u>'''Conflict:'''</u></span>====  
==Conflict:==  




====<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[[#x--Precedents:-Identifiability:]]<u>'''Identifiability:'''</u></span>====  
==Identifiability:==  




====<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">'''<u>Collected Precedents:</u>'''</span>====
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Tenure of Elisabeth de Rossignol (May 2005 - July 2008)</span>'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;"> - </span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;">[[http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/elisabeth/armory.html#FLAMES|FLAMES and FIRE]]</span>
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The 2nd Tenure of François la Flamme (October 2004 - May 2005) - </span>'''<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;">[[http://www.ellipsis.cx/~liana/sca/armoryprec.html#FLAMES|FLAMES and FIRE]]</span>
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Shauna of Carrick Point (May 2004 - August 2004) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of François la Flamme (August 2001 - April 2004) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Elsbeth Anne Roth (June 1999 - July 2001) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Jaelle of Armida (June 1996 - June 1999) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The 2nd Tenure of Da'ud ibn Auda (November 1993 - June 1996) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Bruce Draconarius of Mistholme (June 1992 - October 1993) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The 1st Tenure of Da'ud ibn Auda (June 1990 - June 1992) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Alisoun MacCoul of Elphane (September 1986 - June 1990) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Baldwin of Erebor (August 1984 - August 1986) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Wilhelm von Schlüssel (August 1979 - August 1984) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Karina of the Far West (December 1975 - June 1979) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Early Days (June 1971 - June 1975) -</span>'''


----
==Collected Precedents:==
<span style="background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.5;">'''The''' </span>'''<span style="font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.5;">[[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/index.html|Ordinary ]]</span>'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.5;">''':'''</span>
* 2nd Tenure of Elisabeth de Rossignol (April 2011 - August 2011) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/elisabeth/armory2.html Collected Armory Precedents]
* Enflamed object - see [[http:''oanda.sca.org/ordinary/F.html#fire|Fire]] and [[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/B.html#beacon|Beacon]] and [[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/T.html#torch|Torch]] and [[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/G.html#grenade|Grenade]] and [[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/R.html#reptilelizard|Reptile - Lizard]] and [[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/C.html#candle|Candle]] and [[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/L.html#lamp|Lamp]] and [[http:''oanda.sca.org/ordinary/M.html#monsterphoenix|Monster - Phoenix]]
* 1st Tenure of Elisabeth de Rossignol (May 2005 - July 2008) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/elisabeth/armory.html#FLAMES FLAMES and FIRE]
* The 2nd Tenure of François la Flamme (October 2004 - May 2005) - [http://www.ellipsis.cx/~liana/sca/armoryprec.html#FLAMES FLAMES and FIRE]
* The Tenure of Shauna of Carrick Point (May 2004 - August 2004) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/shauna/armory.html Collected Armory Precedents]
* 1st Tenure of François la Flamme (August 2001 - April 2004) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/francois/wreath.html Collected Armory Precedents]
* The Tenure of Elsbeth Anne Roth (June 1999 - July 2001) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/elsbeth/armory.html Collected Armory Precedents]
* The Tenure of Jaelle of Armida (June 1996 - June 1999) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/jaeprec.html Single HTML Document]
* 2nd Tenure of Da'ud ibn Auda (November 1993 - June 1996) -
** [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/daud2/volume3.html the 1st part (Nov 1993 - June 1994)] and
** [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/daud2/daudIITOC.html the 2nd part (July 1994 - June 1996)]
* The Tenure of Bruce Draconarius of Mistholme (June 1992 - October 1993) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/ Collected precedents]
* 1st Tenure of Da'ud ibn Auda (June 1990 - June 1992) -
**  [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/daud/daud1toc.html the 1st year (June 1990 - June 1991)] and
**  [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/daud/daud1btoc.html the 2nd year (July 1991 - June 1992)]
* The Tenure of Alisoun MacCoul of Elphane (September 1986 - June 1990) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/alisoun/AMETOP.html Collected Precedents]
* The Tenure of Baldwin of Erebor (August 1984 - August 1986) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/baldwin.html Single HTML Document]
* The Tenure of Wilhelm von Schlüssel (August 1979 - August 1984) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/wilhelm/volume3.html Collected Precedents]
* The Tenure of Karina of the Far West (December 1975 - June 1979) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/karina/volume2.html Collected Precedents]
* The Early Days (June 1971 - June 1975) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/early/volume1.html Collected Precedents]


=Ordinary=
* Enflamed object - see [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/F.html#fire Fire] and [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/B.html#beacon Beacon] and [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/T.html#torch Torch] and [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/G.html#grenade Grenade] and [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/R.html#reptilelizard Reptile - Lizard] and [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/C.html#candle Candle] and [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/L.html#lamp Lamp] and [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/M.html#monsterphoenix Monster - Phoenix]


[[Category:Armory]] [[Category:Need Work]]
[[Category:Armory]]

Latest revision as of 14:52, 16 April 2021

WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wikispace only to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources as linked below to verify the information and use them for your documentation.


The preferred, period form of "flaming" per 1993 precedent. See below.

See also Fire


Definition:[edit | edit source]

Glossary of Terms - A charge which has small gouts of flame issuing from it. See also Fire. http://heraldry.sca.org/coagloss.html


Examples:[edit | edit source]

Period source:[edit | edit source]

Siebmacher Siebmacher

An Ordinary of Siebmacher's Wappenbuch[edit | edit source]

Modern[edit | edit source]

Pictorial Dictionary of SCA Heraldry (3rd edition):[edit | edit source]

Per Mistholme, may use PicDic art for submission purposes without prior permission.

Vector Graphics:[edit | edit source]

Annotated Pennsic Traceable Art Project[edit | edit source]

Sources:[edit | edit source]

Academy of St. Gabriel "Medieval Heraldry Archive" - http://www.s-gabriel.org/heraldry/
Archive of St. Gabriel reports - http://www.panix.com/~gabriel/public-bin/archive.cgi

Laurel Armory Articles - http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/armory_articles.html

Period Armorials


Precedents:[edit | edit source]

Precedents of the SCA College of Arms - [[http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents.html
Morsulus Heralds Website - http://www.morsulus.org/ (to search the LoARs and Precedents)

Use the above links to be sure any precedents listed below haven't been superseded by newer precedents.

Definition/Defining Instance:[edit | edit source]

===November 2020 CL - On Flames This month, Iago Coquille takes us on an excursion through the depictions of flames in period heraldry. His article is currently available at the Laurel website at https://heraldry.sca.org/armory/flames/, and discusses:

  • Flame shape
  • Disconnected flames
  • Tinctures, including proper
  • Depiction of strewn flames

Iago's research affects two items this month. Specifically, we are now overturning precedent: the so-called "crab-claw" depiction, previously viewed as modern as declared on the September 2019 Cover Letter, is now shown to be period and, therefore, usable in Society armory. It is worth noting that not all the sources are Italian -- English, French, and German sources are also represented among others.

Additionally, the ways in which multi-color flames have been depicted in period are much more varied than is typical of our practice. In particular, we now have sufficient evidence to support a variety of ways in which flames may incorporate both red and yellow and still be considered proper, extending beyond our long-held standard of alternating tongues of Or and gules, and future submissions will benefit from this evidence.

https://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2020/11/20-11cl.html

June 1993 Cover Letter: period enflaming[edit | edit source]

For some time now, we've been instituting a change (actually dating from Master Da'ud's tenure as Laurel) on enflamed charges: how they're considered, and how they're blazoned. In the early days of the Society, a [charge] enflamed was depicted as a [charge] completely enveloped by flame --- essentially a full flame, with the [charge] entirely on the flame. In those cases, the [charge] was considered the primary charge, with the flames either an artistic detail or a complex sort of fimbriation. More recently, such designs have been blazoned On a flame a [charge], making the flame the primary and the [charge] a tertiary. This has two effects: it brings our heraldic practice closer to that of period, and it alters the way difference is counted against such designs.

On the first point, enflamed charges weren't normally depicted in period armory as enveloped of flames. Discounting the fiery charges whose flames have a defined placement (e.g., the beacon), a period enflamed charge would be drawn with tiny spurts of flame issuant from several points. Mounts enflamed were not uncommon: in addition to the examples of MacKenzie armory cited by Lady Black Stag (in her commentary on Michael McKenzie, on this LoAR), there's the mountain couped azure enflamed proper in the arms of MacLeod (Guillim, 1632, p.127) and the trimount couped vert enflamed gules in the arms of Lerchenfeld (Siebmacher, 1605, plate 95) and Nouwer (Armorial de Gelres, c.1370, fo.40). There's also the arms of Brandt (Argent, a ragged staff bendwise sable enflamed gules), where the enflaming is depicted in various sources (Siebmacher, Gelres, the European Armorial) as on the top end of the staff, issuant from each "ragged" portion, or issuant to chief --- but never as On a flame gules a ragged staff sable. The salamander is usually shown with spurts of flame, but occasionally as lying on a bed of flame (Dennys' Heraldic Imagination, p.193); but I could find no period emblazon showing the salamander as a tertiary on a flame. The enflamed towers of the arms of Dublin are drawn with spurts of fire from the battlements and windows, not as flames with tertiary towers. I could go on, but I think the point is made: in period, the normal depiction of a [charge] enflamed showed the charge on the field, with tiny spurts of flame issuant (and also on the field).

Two consequences follow from this depiction. First, the [charge] and the flames must both have good contrast with the field. Enflaming isn't a way to get around the Rule of Tincture; we don't permit flaming fimbriation in Society armory. Second, by the period definition of enflaming an enflamed [charge] is definitely the main charge; but by the old SCA definition, an enflamed [charge] is now considered a tertiary charge. We'd count Sufficient Difference, per X.2, between a lion Or enflamed gules and a tower Or enflamed gules, but no difference at all, per X.4.j.ii, between on a flame gules a lion Or and on a flame gules a tower Or.

In all ways, then, it's in the submitter's best interest to render an enflamed charge in the period style, rather than as a tertiary on a flame. It's more authentic, and it reduces the chance of conflict. (24 July, 1993 Cover Letter (June, 1993 LoAR), pp. 5-6) http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/1993/06/cvr.html

Registerability:[edit | edit source]

(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)

Conflict:[edit | edit source]

Identifiability:[edit | edit source]

Collected Precedents:[edit | edit source]

Ordinary[edit | edit source]