Enflamed: Difference between revisions

From SCA Heraldry Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
The preferred, period form of "flaming" per 1993 precedent. See below.
The preferred, period form of "flaming" per 1993 precedent. See below.
----
----
===<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Definition:</span>===  
=Definition:=  
Glossary of Terms - A charge which has small gouts of flame issuing from it. ''See also'' [[scaheraldry/On a flame|On a flame]].
Glossary of Terms - A charge which has small gouts of flame issuing from it. ''See also'' [[Fire]].
[[http://heraldry.sca.org/coagloss.html]]
http://heraldry.sca.org/coagloss.html


----
 
===<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Illustrations:</span>===  
=Examples:=  
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Illustration from period source:</span>
==Period source:==
{|
{|
| [[File:Siebmacher_plate095_enflamedmount.jpg|Siebmacher]] || [[File:Siebmacher_plate041_enflamedstaff.jpg|Siebmacher]] ||   
| [[File:Siebmacher_plate095_enflamedmount.jpg|Siebmacher]] || [[File:Siebmacher_plate041_enflamedstaff.jpg|Siebmacher]] ||   
|}
|}


===An Ordinary of Siebmacher's ''Wappenbuch''===
* http://www.ellipsis.cx/~liana/heraldry/siebmacher/siebmacherordinary.html


==Modern==
===Pictorial Dictionary of SCA Heraldry (3rd edition):===
<span style="display: block; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
* [http://mistholme.com/dictionary/flame/ Flame]


'''Pictorial Dictionary of SCA Heraldry (3rd edition):'''
Per Mistholme, may use PicDic art for submission purposes without prior permission.


<span style="display: block; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
===Vector Graphics:===  
* <span style="font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">''<span style="background-color: #edf6fe; color: #333333; font-family: Verdana,sans-serif; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="color: #123b66; font-family: inherit; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">[[http://mistholme.com/dictionary/flame/|Flame]]</span></span>''</span>
* [[Book of Traceable Heraldic Art]] - http://heraldicart.org/
</span>
 
===Annotated [[Pennsic Traceable Art Project]]===




=Sources:=
Academy of St. Gabriel "Medieval Heraldry Archive" - http://www.s-gabriel.org/heraldry/ <br>
Archive of St. Gabriel reports - http://www.panix.com/~gabriel/public-bin/archive.cgi <br>


<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Illustration/s from Brickbat's Armorial Stash - [[http://atensubmissions.nexiliscom.com/HeraldicArtBits.shtml]]:</span>
Laurel Armory Articles - http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/armory_articles.html
[[File:salamander|Brickbats]]


<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Pennsic Traceable Art Project:</span>
[[Period Armorials]]


----
===<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Sources:</span>===
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Academy of St. Gabriel "Medieval Heraldry Archive" - [[http://www.s-gabriel.org/heraldry/]]</span>
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Archive of St. Gabriel reports - [[http://www.panix.com/~gabriel/public-bin/archive.cgi]]</span>


<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Laurel Armory Articles - [[http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/armory_articles.html]]</span>
=Precedents:=
Precedents of the SCA College of Arms - [[http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents.html <br>
Morsulus Heralds Website - http://www.morsulus.org/ (to search the LoARs and Precedents)


<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[[scaheraldry/Period Armorials|Period Armorials]]</span>
'' '''Use the above links to be sure any precedents listed below haven't been superseded by newer precedents.''' ''


----
==Definition/Defining Instance:==
===<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Precedents:</span>===  
===June 1993 Cover Letter: period enflaming===  
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Precedents of the SCA College of Arms - [[http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents.html]]</span>
For some time now, we've been instituting a change (actually dating from Master Da'ud's tenure as Laurel) on enflamed charges: how they're considered, and how they're blazoned. In the early days of the Society, a ''[charge] enflamed'' was depicted as a ''[charge]'' completely enveloped by flame --- essentially a full flame, with the [charge] entirely on the flame. In those cases, the [charge] was considered the primary charge, with the flames either an artistic detail or a complex sort of fimbriation. More recently, such designs have been blazoned ''On a flame a [charge]'', making the flame the primary and the [charge] a tertiary. This has two effects: it brings our heraldic practice closer to that of period, and it alters the way difference is counted against such designs.
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Morsulus Heralds Website - [[http://www.morsulus.org/]] (to search the LoARs and Precedents)</span>
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Restatement Wiki - [[http://yehudaheraldry.com/restatement/index.php?title=Main_Page]] (restatements of Precedents)</span>
''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">'''Use the above links to be sure any precedents listed below haven't been superseded by newer precedents.'''</span>''


====<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[[#x--Precedents:-Definition/Defining Instance:]]<u>'''Definition/Defining Instance:'''</u></span>====
On the first point, enflamed charges weren't normally depicted in period armory as enveloped of flames. Discounting the fiery charges whose flames have a defined placement (e.g., the ''beacon''), a period enflamed charge would be drawn with tiny spurts of flame issuant from several points. ''Mounts enflamed'' were not uncommon: in addition to the examples of MacKenzie armory cited by Lady Black Stag (in her commentary on Michael McKenzie, on this LoAR), there's the ''mountain couped azure enflamed proper'' in the arms of MacLeod (Guillim, 1632, p.127) and the ''trimount couped vert enflamed gules'' in the arms of Lerchenfeld (Siebmacher, 1605, plate 95) and Nouwer (Armorial de Gelres, c.1370, fo.40). There's also the arms of Brandt (''Argent, a ragged staff bendwise sable enflamed gules''), where the enflaming is depicted in various sources (Siebmacher, Gelres, the European Armorial) as on the top end of the staff, issuant from each "ragged" portion, or issuant to chief --- but never as ''On a flame gules a ragged staff sable''. The salamander is usually shown with spurts of flame, but occasionally as lying on a bed of flame (Dennys' Heraldic Imagination, p.193); but I could find no period emblazon showing the salamander as a tertiary on a flame. The enflamed towers of the arms of Dublin are drawn with spurts of fire from the battlements and windows, not as flames with tertiary towers. I could go on, but I think the point is made: in period, the normal depiction of a ''[charge] enflamed'' showed the charge on the field, with tiny spurts of flame issuant (and also on the field).
===<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">'''<span style="font-size: 13px;">From the June 1993 Cover Letter:</span>'''</span>===
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">For some time now, we've been instituting a change (actually dating from Master Da'ud's tenure as Laurel) on enflamed charges: how they're considered, and how they're blazoned. In the early days of the Society, a </span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[charge] enflamed</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> was depicted as a </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[charge]</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">completely enveloped by flame --- essentially a full flame, with the [charge] entirely on the flame. In those cases, the [charge] was considered the primary charge, with the flames either an artistic detail or a complex sort of fimbriation. More recently, such designs have been blazoned </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">On a flame a [charge]</span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">, making the flame the primary and the [charge] a tertiary. This has two effects: it brings our heraldic practice closer to that of period, and it alters the way difference is counted against such designs.</span>


<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">On the first point, enflamed charges weren't normally depicted in period armory as enveloped of flames. Discounting the fiery charges whose flames have a defined placement (e.g., the </span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">beacon</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">), a period enflamed charge would be drawn with tiny spurts of flame issuant from several points. </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Mounts enflamed</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> were not uncommon: in addition to the examples of MacKenzie armory cited by Lady Black Stag (in her commentary on Michael McKenzie, on this LoAR), there's the </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">mountain couped azure enflamed proper</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">in the arms of MacLeod ([[scaheraldry/references.html#43|Guillim]], 1632, p.127) and the </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">trimount couped vert enflamed gules</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> in the arms of Lerchenfeld ([[scaheraldry/references.html#86|Siebmacher]], 1605, plate 95) and Nouwer ([[scaheraldry/references.html#48|Armorial de Gelres]], c.1370, fo.40). There's also the arms of Brandt (</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Argent, a ragged staff bendwise sable enflamed gules</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">), where the enflaming is depicted in various sources ([[scaheraldry/references.html#86|Siebmacher ]], Gelres, the [[scaheraldry/references.html#63|European Armoria]]) as on the top end of the staff, issuant from each "ragged" portion, or issuant to chief --- but never as </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">On a flame gules a ragged staff sable</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">. The salamander is usually shown with spurts of flame, but occasionally as lying on a bed of flame (Dennys' [[scaheraldry/references.html#26|Heraldic Imagination]], p.193); but I could find no period emblazon showing the salamander as a tertiary on a flame. The enflamed towers of the arms of Dublin are drawn with spurts of fire from the battlements and windows, not as flames with tertiary towers. I could go on, but I think the point is made: in period, the normal depiction of a </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[charge] enflamed</span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> showed the charge on the field, with tiny spurts of flame issuant (and also on the field).</span>
Two consequences follow from this depiction. First, the ''[charge]'' and the flames must both have good contrast with the field. Enflaming isn't a way to get around the Rule of Tincture; we don't permit flaming fimbriation in Society armory. Second, by the period definition of ''enflaming'' an enflamed [charge] is definitely the main charge; but by the old SCA definition, an enflamed [charge] is now considered a tertiary charge. We'd count Sufficient Difference, per X.2, between ''a lion Or enflamed gules'' and ''a tower Or enflamed gules'', but no difference at all, per X.4.j.ii, between on ''a flame gules a lion Or'' and ''on a flame gules a tower Or''.


<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Two consequences follow from this depiction. First, the </span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[charge]</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> and the flames must both have good contrast with the field. Enflaming isn't a way to get around the Rule of Tincture; we don't permit flaming fimbriation in Society armory. Second, by the period definition of </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">enflaming</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> an enflamed </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[charge]</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> is definitely the main charge; but by the old SCA definition, an enflamed </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[charge]</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">is now considered a tertiary charge. We'd count Sufficient Difference, per X.2, between </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">a lion Or enflamed gules</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> and </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">a tower Or enflamed gules</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">, but no difference at all, per X.4.j.ii, between on </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">a flame gules a lion Or</span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> and </span>//<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">on a flame gules a tower Or</span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">.</span>
In all ways, then, it's in the submitter's best interest to render an enflamed charge in the period style, rather than as a tertiary on a flame. It's more authentic, '''and''' it reduces the chance of conflict. (24 July, 1993 Cover Letter (June, 1993 LoAR), pp. 5-6)
http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/1993/06/cvr.html


<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">In all ways, then, it's in the submitter's best interest to render an enflamed charge in the period style, rather than as a tertiary on a flame. It's more authentic, </span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">'''and'''</span>''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;"> it reduces the chance of conflict. (24 July, 1993 Cover Letter (June, 1993 LoAR), pp. 5-6)</span>
[[http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/1993/06/cvr.html]]


==Registerability:==
''(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)''


====<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[[#x--Precedents:-Registerability:]]<u>'''Registerability:'''</u></span>====
==Conflict:==  
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)</span>


====<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[[#x--Precedents:-Conflict:]]<u>'''Conflict:'''</u></span>====


==Identifiability:==


====<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[[#x--Precedents:-Identifiability:]]<u>'''Identifiability:'''</u></span>====




====<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">'''<u>Collected Precedents:</u>'''</span>====
Tenure of Elisabeth de Rossignol (May 2005 - July 2008)</span>'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;"> - </span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;">[[http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/elisabeth/armory.html#FLAMES|FLAMES and FIRE]]</span>
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">Tenure of Elisabeth de Rossignol (May 2005 - July 2008)</span>'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;"> - </span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;">[[http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/elisabeth/armory.html#FLAMES|FLAMES and FIRE]]</span>
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The 2nd Tenure of François la Flamme (October 2004 - May 2005) - </span>'''<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;">[[http://www.ellipsis.cx/~liana/sca/armoryprec.html#FLAMES|FLAMES and FIRE]]</span>
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The 2nd Tenure of François la Flamme (October 2004 - May 2005) - </span>'''<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;">[[http://www.ellipsis.cx/~liana/sca/armoryprec.html#FLAMES|FLAMES and FIRE]]</span>
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Shauna of Carrick Point (May 2004 - August 2004) -</span>'''
 
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of François la Flamme (August 2001 - April 2004) -</span>'''
 
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Elsbeth Anne Roth (June 1999 - July 2001) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Jaelle of Armida (June 1996 - June 1999) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The 2nd Tenure of Da'ud ibn Auda (November 1993 - June 1996) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Bruce Draconarius of Mistholme (June 1992 - October 1993) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The 1st Tenure of Da'ud ibn Auda (June 1990 - June 1992) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Alisoun MacCoul of Elphane (September 1986 - June 1990) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Baldwin of Erebor (August 1984 - August 1986) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Wilhelm von Schlüssel (August 1979 - August 1984) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Tenure of Karina of the Far West (December 1975 - June 1979) -</span>'''
'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">The Early Days (June 1971 - June 1975) -</span>'''


----
----
<span style="background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.5;">'''The''' </span>'''<span style="font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.5;">[[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/index.html|Ordinary ]]</span>'''<span style="background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 1.1em; line-height: 1.5;">''':'''</span>
=Ordinary=
* Enflamed object - see [[http:''oanda.sca.org/ordinary/F.html#fire|Fire]] and [[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/B.html#beacon|Beacon]] and [[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/T.html#torch|Torch]] and [[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/G.html#grenade|Grenade]] and [[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/R.html#reptilelizard|Reptile - Lizard]] and [[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/C.html#candle|Candle]] and [[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/L.html#lamp|Lamp]] and [[http:''oanda.sca.org/ordinary/M.html#monsterphoenix|Monster - Phoenix]]
* Enflamed object - see [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/F.html#fire Fire]] and [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/B.html#beacon Beacon] and [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/T.html#torch Torch] and [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/G.html#grenade Grenade] and [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/R.html#reptilelizard Reptile - Lizard] and [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/C.html#candle Candle] and [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/L.html#lamp Lamp] and [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/M.html#monsterphoenix Monster - Phoenix]
 


[[Category:Armory]] [[Category:Need Work]]
[[Category:Armory]] [[Category:Need Work]]

Revision as of 14:40, 16 April 2021

WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wikispace only to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources as linked below to verify the information and use them for your documentation.


The preferred, period form of "flaming" per 1993 precedent. See below.


Definition:

Glossary of Terms - A charge which has small gouts of flame issuing from it. See also Fire. http://heraldry.sca.org/coagloss.html


Examples:

Period source:

Siebmacher Siebmacher

An Ordinary of Siebmacher's Wappenbuch

Modern

Pictorial Dictionary of SCA Heraldry (3rd edition):

Per Mistholme, may use PicDic art for submission purposes without prior permission.

Vector Graphics:

Annotated Pennsic Traceable Art Project

Sources:

Academy of St. Gabriel "Medieval Heraldry Archive" - http://www.s-gabriel.org/heraldry/
Archive of St. Gabriel reports - http://www.panix.com/~gabriel/public-bin/archive.cgi

Laurel Armory Articles - http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/armory_articles.html

Period Armorials


Precedents:

Precedents of the SCA College of Arms - [[http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents.html
Morsulus Heralds Website - http://www.morsulus.org/ (to search the LoARs and Precedents)

Use the above links to be sure any precedents listed below haven't been superseded by newer precedents.

Definition/Defining Instance:

June 1993 Cover Letter: period enflaming

For some time now, we've been instituting a change (actually dating from Master Da'ud's tenure as Laurel) on enflamed charges: how they're considered, and how they're blazoned. In the early days of the Society, a [charge] enflamed was depicted as a [charge] completely enveloped by flame --- essentially a full flame, with the [charge] entirely on the flame. In those cases, the [charge] was considered the primary charge, with the flames either an artistic detail or a complex sort of fimbriation. More recently, such designs have been blazoned On a flame a [charge], making the flame the primary and the [charge] a tertiary. This has two effects: it brings our heraldic practice closer to that of period, and it alters the way difference is counted against such designs.

On the first point, enflamed charges weren't normally depicted in period armory as enveloped of flames. Discounting the fiery charges whose flames have a defined placement (e.g., the beacon), a period enflamed charge would be drawn with tiny spurts of flame issuant from several points. Mounts enflamed were not uncommon: in addition to the examples of MacKenzie armory cited by Lady Black Stag (in her commentary on Michael McKenzie, on this LoAR), there's the mountain couped azure enflamed proper in the arms of MacLeod (Guillim, 1632, p.127) and the trimount couped vert enflamed gules in the arms of Lerchenfeld (Siebmacher, 1605, plate 95) and Nouwer (Armorial de Gelres, c.1370, fo.40). There's also the arms of Brandt (Argent, a ragged staff bendwise sable enflamed gules), where the enflaming is depicted in various sources (Siebmacher, Gelres, the European Armorial) as on the top end of the staff, issuant from each "ragged" portion, or issuant to chief --- but never as On a flame gules a ragged staff sable. The salamander is usually shown with spurts of flame, but occasionally as lying on a bed of flame (Dennys' Heraldic Imagination, p.193); but I could find no period emblazon showing the salamander as a tertiary on a flame. The enflamed towers of the arms of Dublin are drawn with spurts of fire from the battlements and windows, not as flames with tertiary towers. I could go on, but I think the point is made: in period, the normal depiction of a [charge] enflamed showed the charge on the field, with tiny spurts of flame issuant (and also on the field).

Two consequences follow from this depiction. First, the [charge] and the flames must both have good contrast with the field. Enflaming isn't a way to get around the Rule of Tincture; we don't permit flaming fimbriation in Society armory. Second, by the period definition of enflaming an enflamed [charge] is definitely the main charge; but by the old SCA definition, an enflamed [charge] is now considered a tertiary charge. We'd count Sufficient Difference, per X.2, between a lion Or enflamed gules and a tower Or enflamed gules, but no difference at all, per X.4.j.ii, between on a flame gules a lion Or and on a flame gules a tower Or.

In all ways, then, it's in the submitter's best interest to render an enflamed charge in the period style, rather than as a tertiary on a flame. It's more authentic, and it reduces the chance of conflict. (24 July, 1993 Cover Letter (June, 1993 LoAR), pp. 5-6) http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/1993/06/cvr.html


Registerability:

(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)

Conflict:

Identifiability:

Tenure of Elisabeth de Rossignol (May 2005 - July 2008) - [and FIRE] The 2nd Tenure of François la Flamme (October 2004 - May 2005) - [and FIRE]



Ordinary