Editing Flowers (Charge)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
* Parker's Heraldry - http://karlwilcox.com/parker/ | * Parker's Heraldry - http://karlwilcox.com/parker/ | ||
* Riestap's ''Armorial Général - http: | * Riestap's ''Armorial Général - //http:''www.euraldic.com/lasu/bl/bl_a_aa.html | ||
=Precedents:= | =Precedents:= | ||
Line 123: | Line 124: | ||
==Conflict:== | ==Conflict:== | ||
==March 2020 - From Wreath: Roses and Columbines, etc.== | |||
Recently, the question came up about how much heraldic difference we grant for type of flower. It arose with the submission of Adriana de Fleurs, Azure, three columbines slipped and leaved argent, pended on the LoAR of October 2019. The issue was potential conflict with the registered arms of Jonas Aquilian, Azure, three roses argent. Our current policy allows a DC to be granted for type of flower, but not the Substantial Change sufficient to clear conflict on its own. | Recently, the question came up about how much heraldic difference we grant for type of flower. It arose with the submission of Adriana de Fleurs, Azure, three columbines slipped and leaved argent, pended on the LoAR of October 2019. The issue was potential conflict with the registered arms of Jonas Aquilian, Azure, three roses argent. Our current policy allows a DC to be granted for type of flower, but not the Substantial Change sufficient to clear conflict on its own. | ||