Editing Fret, Fretty, Fretted

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 23: Line 23:
==Modern:==  
==Modern:==  
===Pictorial Dictionary of SCA Heraldry (3rd edition):===  
===Pictorial Dictionary of SCA Heraldry (3rd edition):===  
http://mistholme.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/fret-265x300.jpg
* [http://mistholme.com/dictionary/fret/ Fret]
* [http://mistholme.com/dictionary/fret/ Fret]
* [http://mistholme.com/dictionary/fretty/ Fretty]
* [http://mistholme.com/dictionary/fretty/ Fretty]
* [http://mistholme.com/dictionary/grillage/ Grillage]
* [http://mistholme.com/dictionary/grillage/ Grillage]
* [http://mistholme.com/dictionary/net/ Net]
* [http://mistholme.com/dictionary/net/ Net]
http://mistholme.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/fret-265x300.jpg


===Vector Graphics:===  
===Vector Graphics:===  
Line 77: Line 77:
* I am forced to conclude that fretty is an artistic variant of the fret, and therefore a single charge. Partially, this is from the evidence of heraldic tracts: most of those I consulted did not (as the Argentaye Tract did) give a verbal description of fretty, but rather defined it by illustration --- and in so doing, drew no substantive distinction between what we would call "fretty" and "a fret". [[http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/references.html#53|Legh]], 1562, blazons both renderings as a frett; [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/references.html#11 Bossewell], 1572, and [[http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/references.html#43 Guillim], 1610, follow Legh's lead on this. [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/references.html#25 Bara]], 1581, does the reverse, blazoning as fretté what we would call "a fret".
* I am forced to conclude that fretty is an artistic variant of the fret, and therefore a single charge. Partially, this is from the evidence of heraldic tracts: most of those I consulted did not (as the Argentaye Tract did) give a verbal description of fretty, but rather defined it by illustration --- and in so doing, drew no substantive distinction between what we would call "fretty" and "a fret". [[http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/references.html#53|Legh]], 1562, blazons both renderings as a frett; [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/references.html#11 Bossewell], 1572, and [[http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/references.html#43 Guillim], 1610, follow Legh's lead on this. [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/references.html#25 Bara]], 1581, does the reverse, blazoning as fretté what we would call "a fret".
Better evidence is found in the actual display of armory using fretty/a fret. Nearly every individual bearing arms with a fret on one roll may be found bearing the same arms fretty on another roll: e.g. John Maltravers, late 13th Century, who bore Sable fretty Or on the St. George's Roll and Sable, a fret Or on the Parliamentary Roll. The equivalence held true through Tudor times: the FitzWilliam Roll, c.1530, gives the arms of Theobald Verdon (Or, a fret gules) as Or fretty gules. The equivalence even held true in the presence of other charges on the field: e.g. the arms of Amery St. Armand were seen both as Or fretty and on a chief sable three bezants and Or, a fret and on a chief sable three bezants, and the arms of Despencer were seen both as Quarterly argent and gules fretty Or, a bendlet sable and Quarterly argent and gules, a bendlet sable between two frets Or. The latter example was, again, valid through Tudor times. (Sources: [[http:''heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/references.html#20|Dictionary of British Arms]], vol.I, pp.338-340; [[http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/references.html#51|Anglo-Norman Armory II]], pp.454-460; and see also the visual examples in Foster's [[http:''heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/references.html#37|Dictionary of Heraldry]], under the names of Maltravers, Harington/Haverington, and Belhuse/Bellewe.)
Better evidence is found in the actual display of armory using fretty/a fret. Nearly every individual bearing arms with a fret on one roll may be found bearing the same arms fretty on another roll: e.g. John Maltravers, late 13th Century, who bore Sable fretty Or on the St. George's Roll and Sable, a fret Or on the Parliamentary Roll. The equivalence held true through Tudor times: the FitzWilliam Roll, c.1530, gives the arms of Theobald Verdon (Or, a fret gules) as Or fretty gules. The equivalence even held true in the presence of other charges on the field: e.g. the arms of Amery St. Armand were seen both as Or fretty and on a chief sable three bezants and Or, a fret and on a chief sable three bezants, and the arms of Despencer were seen both as Quarterly argent and gules fretty Or, a bendlet sable and Quarterly argent and gules, a bendlet sable between two frets Or. The latter example was, again, valid through Tudor times. (Sources: [[http:''heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/references.html#20|Dictionary of British Arms]], vol.I, pp.338-340; [[http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/references.html#51|Anglo-Norman Armory II]], pp.454-460; and see also the visual examples in Foster's [[http:''heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/references.html#37|Dictionary of Heraldry]], under the names of Maltravers, Harington/Haverington, and Belhuse/Bellewe.)
*The main reason that Gules fretty Or, overall a lion argent conflicts with Gules fretty Or lies not in how we consider fretty, but in how we consider overall charges. So long as overall charges, by definition, can never be primary charges, such conflicts will continue to exist. Such considerations cannot change the evidence, however; the majority of the evidence shows fretty and a fret to be interchangeable charges, artistic variations of one another, and we shall henceforth so treat them. (10 November, 1992 Cover Letter (September, 1992 LoAR), pp. 3-4)
The main reason that Gules fretty Or, overall a lion argent conflicts with Gules fretty Or lies not in how we consider fretty, but in how we consider overall charges. So long as overall charges, by definition, can never be primary charges, such conflicts will continue to exist. Such considerations cannot change the evidence, however; the majority of the evidence shows fretty and a fret to be interchangeable charges, artistic variations of one another, and we shall henceforth so treat them. (10 November, 1992 Cover Letter (September, 1992 LoAR), pp. 3-4)
*http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/fret.html
[[http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/fret.html]]




==Registerability:==  
====<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[[#x--Precedents:-Registerability:]]<u>'''Registerability:'''</u></span>====  
(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)</span>
<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)</span>


===November 2015 - four needles fretted in mascle===  
===<span style="background-color: #f6f7f9; color: #1d2129; font-family: helvetica,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">November 2015 - four needles fretted in mascle</span>===  
Angharad verch Rees. The following device associated with this name was registered in November of 2015 (via the East): Gules, four double-pointed knitting needles fretted in mascle and on a chief Or three gouttes de sang.
<span style="background-color: #f6f7f9; color: #1d2129; font-family: helvetica,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">Angharad verch Rees. The following device associated with this name was registered in November of 2015 (via the East):</span>
*http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2015/11/15-11lar.html#179
<span style="background-color: #f6f7f9; color: #1d2129; font-family: helvetica,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">Gules, four double-pointed knitting needles fretted in mascle and on a chief Or three gouttes de sang.</span>
 
http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2015/11/15-11lar.html#179


===January 2015 - four needles fretted===  
===January 2015 - four needles fretted===  
Stæina knýtir - The following badge associated with this name was registered [http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_date.cgi?y1=2015&m1=January&y2=2015&m2=January&kE=checked in January of 2015 (via the East)]: (Fieldless) Four double-pointed knitting needles fretted in mascle purpure.
[[http:''oanda.sca.org/oanda_name.cgi?p=Staeina%20knytir|Stæina knýtir]] - The following badge associated with this name was registered [[http:''oanda.sca.org/oanda_date.cgi?y1=2015&m1=January&y2=2015&m2=January&kE=checked|in January of 2015 (via the East)]]: (Fieldless) Four double-pointed knitting needles fretted in mascle purpure.
*http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2015/01/15-01lar.html#248
http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2015/01/15-01lar.html#248


==Conflict:==
====<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[[#x--Precedents:-Conflict:]]<u>'''Conflict:'''</u></span>====  
===October 2008 - nailing is not worth a CD===
'''From the October 2008 LoAR:'''
"When fretty has circles at the intersections of the fret overlaps, it is termed 'nailed', such as "Argent fretty sable nailed Or."
"When fretty has circles at the intersections of the fret overlaps, it is termed 'nailed', such as "Argent fretty sable nailed Or."
"Since commenters have found examples of the same device both nailed and not nailed in period, nailing...is not worth a CD."
"Since commenters have found examples of the same device both nailed and not nailed in period, nailing...is not worth a CD."
[http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2008/10/08-10lar.html October 2008 LoAR]
[[http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2008/10/08-10lar.html|October 2008 LoAR]]


===November 1992 - charges over fretty conflict check as overall charges===
'''From the November 1992 Cover Letter:'''
...The main reason that Gules fretty Or, overall a lion argent conflicts with Gules fretty Or lies not in how we consider fretty, but in how we consider overall charges. So long as overall charges, by definition, can never be primary charges, such conflicts will continue to exist. Such considerations cannot change the evidence, however; the majority of the evidence shows fretty and a fret to be interchangeable charges, artistic variations of one another, and we shall henceforth so treat them. (10 November, 1992 Cover Letter (September, 1992 LoAR), pp. 3-4)</span>
<span style="line-height: 1.5;">...The main reason that Gules fretty Or, overall a lion argent conflicts with Gules fretty Or lies not in how we consider fretty, but in how we consider overall charges. So long as overall charges, by definition, can never be primary charges, such conflicts will continue to exist. Such considerations cannot change the evidence, however; the majority of the evidence shows fretty and a fret to be interchangeable charges, artistic variations of one another, and we shall henceforth so treat them. (10 November, 1992 Cover Letter (September, 1992 LoAR), pp. 3-4)</span>
*http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/fret.html
[[http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/fret.html]]


===January 1992 - no difference between fret vs fretty===
'''From the January 1992 LoAR''':
"There is a CD for the changes to the tertiaries, but by prior Laurel precedent nothing for the change between a fret and fretty"
"There is a CD for the changes to the tertiaries, but by prior Laurel precedent nothing for the change between a fret and fretty"
[http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/1992/01/lar.html January 1992 LoAR]
[[http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/1992/01/lar.html|January 1992 LoAR]]




==Identifiability:==  
====<span style="background-color: #ffffff;">[[#x--Precedents:-Identifiability:]]<u>'''Identifiability:'''</u></span>====  




Line 132: Line 134:
* The Early Days (June 1971 - June 1975) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/early/volume1.html Collected Precedents]
* The Early Days (June 1971 - June 1975) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/early/volume1.html Collected Precedents]


=In the [[scaheraldry/Ordinary|Ordinary]]=
 
* [http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3aargent Fret - Argent]]
----
* [http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3aazure Fret - Azure]]
<u>'''In the [[scaheraldry/Ordinary|Ordinary]]'''</u>:
* [http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3afur Fret - Fur]]
* [[http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3aargent|Fret - Argent]]
* [http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3agules Fret - Gules]]
* [[http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3aazure|Fret - Azure]]
* [http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3amulticolor Fret - Multicolor]]
* [[http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3afur|Fret - Fur]]
* [http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3aor Fret - Or]]
* [[http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3agules|Fret - Gules]]
* [http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3apurpure Fret - Purpure]]
* [[http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3amulticolor|Fret - Multicolor]]
* [http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3asable Fret - Sable]]
* [[http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3aor|Fret - Or]]
* [http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3avert Fret - Vert]]
* [[http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3apurpure|Fret - Purpure]]
* Fretty - see [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/F.html#fret Fret]]
* [[http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3asable|Fret - Sable]]
* [[http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_desc.cgi?p=FRET%3avert|Fret - Vert]]
* Fretty - see [[http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/F.html#fret|Fret]]




[[Category:Armory]]
[[Category:Armory]] [[Category:Need Work]]
Please note that all contributions to SCA Heraldry Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see SCA Heraldry Wiki:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)