Michaela: Difference between revisions

From SCA Heraldry Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Replaced content with "{{subst:Names}}")
 
No edit summary
Line 32: Line 32:


==Registerability:==  
==Registerability:==  
From the <month> <year> LoAR:
 
===Michaela questionable Latinization===
{| class="wikitable"
|Da'ud ibn Auda (2nd tenure, 2nd year)
|1996.04
|[Isabeau Michaela Hawke (submitted as ''Mikaela'')] Even as Michaela the name is somewhat problematic, since no one has yet demonstrated that it was actually used in period. In the earlier Middle Ages it may have been a Latin documentary feminine form for a woman named Michael, but there is neither evidence nor good argument for its use at the end of our period. Nevertheless, we have recently (12/95, Michaela della Isola, Middle) given it the benefit of the doubt, so we are unwilling to return it outright. To minimize the anomalies while doing the least possible violence to the name, we have therefore simply substituted the more standard spelling. (Talan Gwynek, LoAR April 1996, p. 3)
|}
http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/CompiledNamePrecedents/Compatible.html
 


==Conflict:==
==Conflict:==

Revision as of 09:54, 5 August 2018

WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wikispace only to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources to verify the information and use them for your documentation.


Period Forms:

  • Name - Summarize documentation as you would on a submission form - period spelling, type of name (eg. English feminine give name), date, source.


Other Potential Sources:




Precedents:

  • Precedents of the SCA College of Arms - [[1]]
  • Morsulus Heralds Website - [[2]] (to search the LoARs and Precedents)
  • Use the above links to be sure any precedents listed below haven't been superseded by newer precedents.

Registerability:

Michaela questionable Latinization

Da'ud ibn Auda (2nd tenure, 2nd year) 1996.04 [Isabeau Michaela Hawke (submitted as Mikaela)] Even as Michaela the name is somewhat problematic, since no one has yet demonstrated that it was actually used in period. In the earlier Middle Ages it may have been a Latin documentary feminine form for a woman named Michael, but there is neither evidence nor good argument for its use at the end of our period. Nevertheless, we have recently (12/95, Michaela della Isola, Middle) given it the benefit of the doubt, so we are unwilling to return it outright. To minimize the anomalies while doing the least possible violence to the name, we have therefore simply substituted the more standard spelling. (Talan Gwynek, LoAR April 1996, p. 3)

http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/CompiledNamePrecedents/Compatible.html


Conflict:

From the <month> <year> LoAR:

Collected Precedents: