Wing

From SCA Heraldry Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wikispace only to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources to verify the information and use them for your documentation.

See also Wings that Hold

Illustrations[edit | edit source]

Period[edit | edit source]

BSB 16th 16th
BSB 274, Insignia Veneta, 1550-55, f120r, belled wings, legal? 16th century Italian, wings counterchanged, position? 16th cent. Italian flipper wings?
16th Armorial Siebmacher,
16th century Italian, winged ants Armorial de Gelre, c 1370, winged fish Siebmacher, 1605, plate 69, winged fish

An Ordinary of Siebmacher's Wappenbuch[edit | edit source]


Modern[edit | edit source]

Pictorial Dictionary of SCA Heraldry (3rd edition):[edit | edit source]

Vector Graphics:[edit | edit source]

Annotated Pennsic Traceable Art Project[edit | edit source]

SENA Armory Conflict (SENA A.5.G.7.a.)[edit | edit source]

"Changes that distinctly affect the number of extended wings (from wings folded to raised, or from wings seen on one side of the body to both sides) are sufficient for a distinct change." http://heraldry.sca.org/sena.html#A5G7a

Quick Reference: Bird Postures:[edit | edit source]

http://heraldry.sca.org/armory/bird-postures.html (formerly in the Heraldic Primer)

Wing postures[edit | edit source]

Like the beasts and their head postures, birds have wing position variants as well that are worth blazoning but not worth a CD. But note that:

  • An examination of the development of the various heraldic eagles shows that the direction of the wingtips of a displayed eagle is entirely a matter of artistic license. To avoid incorrectly limiting the submitter's ability to display the arms in reasonable period variants, we will no longer specify "elevated" and "inverted" when blazoning displayed birds. (LoAR August 2001)
Posture Defining traits stylised drawing Example
Addorsed Both wings on same side of body Bird6.gif Addorsed.gif
Displayed Wings on either side of body Bird7.gif Displayed.gif
Elevated Wingtips away from body Bird8.gif Elevated.gif
Inverted Wingtips tucked back towards body Bird9.gif Inverted.gif

Often, the two wing position variants will be used together, thus:

Addorsed.gif Inverted.gif Elevated.gif Displayed.gif
Addorsed and elevated Addorsed and inverted Displayed and elevated Displayed and inverted

[but note the following precedent: "An examination of the development of the various heraldic eagles shows that the direction of the wingtips of a displayed eagle is entirely a matter of artistic license. To avoid incorrectly limiting the submitter's ability to display the arms in reasonable period variants, we will no longer specify "elevated" and "inverted" when blazoning displayed birds." (LoAR August 2001) ]

_ See also Wings that Hold

Precedents:[edit | edit source]

Precedents of the SCA College of Arms - http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents.html
Morsulus Heralds Website - http://www.morsulus.org/ (to search the LoARs and Precedents)

Use the above links to be sure any precedents listed below haven't been superseded by newer precedents.

Definition:[edit | edit source]

Aug 2004 - angel wings default:[edit | edit source]

"we will follow the stated default from Parker and declare that an angel's wings are displayed by default when the angel is affronty."

June 2003 - specifying elevated/inverted:[edit | edit source]

There is also no difference for whether the wingtips of the displayed wings are elevated or inverted. We expect that the same policies that apply to displayed wings on displayed birds should apply to displayed wings on winged objects: An examination of the development of the various heraldic eagles shows that the direction of the wingtips of a displayed eagle is entirely a matter of artistic license. To avoid incorrectly limiting the submitter's ability to display the arms in reasonable period variants, we will no longer specify "elevated" and "inverted" when blazoning displayed birds. (LoAR August 2001)


Registerability:[edit | edit source]

(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)

January 2022 - winged animals proper[edit | edit source]

Tatiana Belaia. Device. Argent, a fox sejant guardant proper winged sable between three hellebore flowers purpure slipped and leaved vert. This device was pended on the August 2021 LoAR to discuss whether or not an animal proper can be winged. SENA A3B1 notes "While a few monsters have a defined proper, most of them do not because they do not exist in nature. Thus, monsters constructed from animals which can otherwise be proper may not be proper."

We allow the addition of wings to inanimate charges proper including charges such as swords and barrels. We find wings added to many charges in period heraldry, including at least one example of a fish proper - the arms of Senitz [Siebmacher 69], described by Siebmacher as "Ein roter Schild / der karpf darin an seiner farb mit w[eiss] flügeln" = "A red shield, the karp therein in its colour [ie. 'proper'] with white wings". We will therefore allow wings to be added to an animal proper. This is not considered a step from core practice. This does not affect the ban on creating monsters from various parts of animals proper.

See also the Cover Letter

https://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2022/01/22-01lar.html#60

May 1983 - insect-winged monsters:[edit | edit source]

Caterina Leonora de Forza. Return of: Vert, a Bengal tiger couchant guardant to sinister with Tiger Swallowtail butterfly wings elevated and addorsed proper within a bordure Or. "The device is not period style. To my knowledge, the only wings added to beasts in period were those of bats or hawks..." http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/1983/05/83-05LAR.html

Conflict:[edit | edit source]

May 2005 - bird vs. bat wings:[edit | edit source]

"we cannot see granting a CD between bird's wings and bat's wings, even as a stand-alone charge." May 2005 LoAR

June 2003 - tips elevated vs inverted:[edit | edit source]

There is also no difference for whether the wingtips of the displayed wings are elevated or inverted. We expect that the same policies that apply to displayed wings on displayed birds should apply to displayed wings on winged objects: An examination of the development of the various heraldic eagles shows that the direction of the wingtips of a displayed eagle is entirely a matter of artistic license. To avoid incorrectly limiting the submitter's ability to display the arms in reasonable period variants, we will no longer specify "elevated" and "inverted" when blazoning displayed birds. (LoAR August 2001) June 2003 LoAR


May 2002 - cd for wing tincture:[edit | edit source]

"There is one CD for changing the tincture of the wings, which are half the charge." May 2002 LoAR


Sept 1997 LoAR - tincture of wings CD:[edit | edit source]

Just as we will give a CD for changing the tincture of the wings on a winged monster, so do we give one for changing the tincture of the flames of a phoenix." September 1997 LoAR

Jan 1995 - bird-winged vs. bat-winged creature:[edit | edit source]

"[a winged serpent vs a bat-winged tree python] The change to the type of wings is too slight to count for the necessary second. [i.e. there is not a significant difference between a bird-winged and a bat-winged creature.] January 1995 LoAR

July 1996 - adding wings generally a CD:[edit | edit source]

[registering two unicorn's heads couped and a pegasus' head couped at the shoulder] Since the unicorn heads are correctly drawn, with horns and beards, and since adding wings to a charge is general[ly] worth a CD, this does not violate our ban on similar yet unlike charges (the sword and dagger rule). (Linette Marie Armellini d'Addabbo, 7/96 p. 6) http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/1996/07/lar.html

Identifiability:[edit | edit source]

Collected Precedents:[edit | edit source]

In the Ordinary:[edit | edit source]

(includes batwing, lure - arrangement)