Editing Within

'''WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wiki to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources (generally linked) to verify the information and use them for your documentation.'''
----
=Examples:= 

==Period:== 
{| class="wikitable"
| [[File:BLANK TN.GIF]] 
| [[File:BLANK TN.GIF]]  
| [[File:BLANK TN.GIF]]  
|}


===An Ordinary of Siebmacher's ''Wappenbuch''=== 
* http://www.ellipsis.cx/~liana/heraldry/siebmacher/siebmacherordinary.html


===Artifacts=== 
{| class="wikitable"
| [[File:BLANK TN.GIF]] 
| [[File:BLANK TN.GIF]]  
| [[File:BLANK TN.GIF]]  
|-
| Information A 
| Information B 
| Information C
|}

==Modern:== 
===Pictorial Dictionary, 3rd edition:=== 
* http://mistholme.com/pictorial-dictionary-of-heraldry

Per Mistholme, may use PicDic art for submission purposes without prior permission.

===Vector Graphics:=== 
* [[Book of Traceable Heraldic Art]] - http://heraldicart.org/

===Annotated [[Pennsic Traceable Art Project]]===

=Sources:= 
* Academy of St. Gabriel "Medieval Heraldry Archive" - http://www.s-gabriel.org/heraldry/
* Archive of St. Gabriel reports - http://www.panix.com/~gabriel/public-bin/archive.cgi
* Laurel Armory Articles - http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/armory_articles.html
* https://iiif.biblissima.fr/collections/ - website that searches multiple great digital libraries


* New Heraldic Primer (Heraldry for Non-Heralds) - http://heraldry.sca.org/armory/newprimer/
* Pictorial Dictionary of Heraldry (PicDic), 3rd Edition - http://mistholme.com/pictorial-dictionary-of-heraldry
* [[Period Armorials]]


* Parker's Heraldry - https://www.heraldsnet.org/saitou/parker/index.htm
* Rietstap's ''Armorial Général - http://www.coats-of-arms-heraldry.com/armoriaux/rietstap.html

=Precedents:= 
Precedents of the SCA College of Arms - http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents.html <br>
Morsulus Heralds Website - http://www.morsulus.org/ (to search the LoARs and Precedents) <br>
'' '''Use the above links to be sure any precedents listed below haven't been superseded by newer precedents.'' '''

==Definition:== 
''(includes defaults, proper tinctures, blazoning)''

===Example===

==Registerability:== 
''(Restricted, Reserved, SFPP, OOP)''

==Conflict:== 


==Identifiability:== 


==Collected Precedents:== 
* 2nd Tenure of Elisabeth de Rossignol (April 2011 - August 2011) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/elisabeth/armory2.html Collected Armory Precedents]
* 1st Tenure of Elisabeth de Rossignol (May 2005 - July 2008) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/elisabeth/armory.html Collected Armory Precedents]
* 2nd Tenure of François la Flamme (October 2004 - May 2005) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/goodbye.cgi?url=http://www.ellipsis.cx/~liana/sca/armoryprec.html Collected Armory Precedents]
* The Tenure of Shauna of Carrick Point (May 2004 - August 2004) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/shauna/armory.html Collected Armory Precedents]
* 1st Tenure of François la Flamme (August 2001 - April 2004) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/francois/wreath.html Collected Armory Precedents]
* The Tenure of Elsbeth Anne Roth (June 1999 - July 2001) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/elsbeth/armory.html Collected Armory Precedents]
* The Tenure of Jaelle of Armida (June 1996 - June 1999) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/jaeprec.html Single HTML Document]
* 2nd Tenure of Da'ud ibn Auda (November 1993 - June 1996) -
** [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/daud2/volume3.html the 1st part (Nov 1993 - June 1994)] and 
** [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/daud2/daudIITOC.html the 2nd part (July 1994 - June 1996)]
* The Tenure of Bruce Draconarius of Mistholme (June 1992 - October 1993) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/bruce/ Collected precedents]
* 1st Tenure of Da'ud ibn Auda (June 1990 - June 1992) -
**  [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/daud/daud1toc.html the 1st year (June 1990 - June 1991)] and
**  [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/daud/daud1btoc.html the 2nd year (July 1991 - June 1992)]
* The Tenure of Alisoun MacCoul of Elphane (September 1986 - June 1990) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/alisoun/AMETOP.html Collected Precedents]
* The Tenure of Baldwin of Erebor (August 1984 - August 1986) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/baldwin.html Single HTML Document]
* The Tenure of Wilhelm von Schlüssel (August 1979 - August 1984) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/wilhelm/volume3.html Collected Precedents]
* The Tenure of Karina of the Far West (December 1975 - June 1979) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/karina/volume2.html Collected Precedents]
* The Early Days (June 1971 - June 1975) - [http://heraldry.sca.org/precedents/early/volume1.html Collected Precedents]

=The [http://oanda.sca.org/ordinary/index.html Ordinary]:= 
* add section link

[[File:Logocaption.jpg|right]]
 '''WARNING: Do not cite this page as a reference. This page is on this wiki to make the content "searchable" and easier to find. If you find the information you seek here, go to the original sources (generally linked) to verify the information and use them for your documentation.'''

[[Category:Armory]] [[Category:References]]
@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 ==Definition:==
 ''(includes defaults, proper tinctures, blazoning)''
-===May 2013 - crescents with things revisited:===
-From Wreath: Crescents and Things Revisited
-Two submissions this month had the motif of ''within and conjoined to a crescent a tree'', where the crescent was very thin and circular, and the tree quite substantial. Under current precedent, the tree is maintained, which seems fundamentally flawed.
-In April 2012, precedent was set regarding how we treat charges within or between the horns of a crescent. At that time, the ruling was:
-* the crescent is the main charge, as it is typically the larger charge
-* if the other charge is entirely within the crescent, it is a maintained charge...
-* if the other charge is placed between the horns of the crescent but extends beyond the bounds of the crescent, it is either a co-primary charge or a secondary charge, depending on the relative sizes of the two charges...
-As shown by the first point, this ruling entirely assumed that crescents would be the typical fat crescent with a small "interior" space between its horns, a more substantial charge than any charge placed within it. However, crescents did in fact vary quite a bit in shape in period, and from round and thick to fairly shallow and thin. The thinner crescents seen in period armorials typically do not extend beyond a semi-circle, looking rather more like bananas in fact, but a more circular thin crescent should not be disallowed in SCA heraldry. It is in fact possible to have a substantial central charge surrounded by a less-substantial thin crescent. Given the variety of crescent shapes, the April 2012 precedent is hereby overturned.</span>
-<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;">We will therefore treat charges entirely within or between the horns of a crescent, conjoined or not, in a similar manner as to how we treat other paired charges as set forth in the February 2012 precedent on sustained and maintained charges: the more substantial charge is the primary or co-primary charge, and the other charge if smaller is a secondary charge or, if conjoined and less than half the visual weight of the other charge, a maintained charge.<
-For example, ''a tree within a crescent'' is a primary tree and a secondary crescent, but ''between the horns of a crescent a tree'' is a primary crescent and a secondary tree. Reblazons to clarify whether a charge ''within a crescent'' is a secondary charge or a maintained charge will occur as needed, with the April 2012 reblazons taking priority.
-http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2013/05/13-05cl.html#7
-==='''April 2012 - crescents with things''':===
-From Wreath: Crescents and Things
-Commenters were asked to discuss how we should blazon the period motif of charges combined with crescents. Placing items between the horns of a crescent is a period heraldic motif. Richard I of England used it as a seal, currently listed in Society armory as the badge ''(Tinctureless) An estoile between the horns of a crescent'', a style of badge that was likely brought back from the East during the Crusades. The family of Percy had as a badge ''within the horns of a crescent a pair of shacklebolts''. Other examples have been found in period armory of other objects set just above or within a crescent.
-Discussion on this motif, informed by the recent discussion, past precedent regarding charges within annulets, and precedent set on the February 2012 Cover Letter regarding sustained secondary charges, has led us to make the following rulings. When considering a charge set between the horns or a crescent or encompassed entirely within the crescent:
-* the crescent is the main charge, as it is typically the larger charge
-* if the other charge is entirely within the crescent, it is a maintained charge, and will be blazoned with the term ''within'' to emphasize its lesser importance. For example, ''within [and conjoined to] a crescent an X''.
-* if the other charge is placed between the horns of the crescent but extends beyond the bounds of the crescent, it is either a co-primary charge or a secondary charge, depending on the relative sizes of the two charges, and will be blazoned with the term ''between the horns'' according to current practice for co-primary and secondary charges. If the charge is conjoined to the crescent and would be considered a secondary charge under this ruling, it is therefore considered a sustained secondary charge. For example, ''in pale an X between [and conjoined to] the horns of a crescent// is a co-primary group. For example, ''between [and conjoined to] the horns of a crescent an X'' or ''a crescent sustaining between its horns an X'' is a primary crescent and a secondary X.
-Whether two charges are conjoined or not does not count for difference, only their relative sizes and position. When a primary crescent and a secondary charge are present in a design where they would be expected to be in a secondary or tertiary charge group, the crescent and charge will both be considered part of the same group.
-http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2012/04/12-04cl.html
 ===Example===